Editorials & Other Articles

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)

38. Maybe he can use this for his defense.

Reply to LiberalArkie (Reply #6)

Thu Dec 24, 2015, 09:45 PM

Dec 2015

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

57 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What Really Happened With the DNC’s “Datagate”? (from Jacobin) [View all] drokhole Dec 2015 OP

Interesting article Gothmog Dec 2015 #1

How could this "harm" the Clinton campaign? artislife Dec 2015 #12

That seems to be the author's conclusion... drokhole Dec 2015 #15

He mentioned they could not even get that detail without being able to download the data newthinking Dec 2015 #17

Agreed drokhole Dec 2015 #20

Nonsense. The strategy and thinking of the Clinton GOTV efforts is probably pretty obvious JDPriestly Dec 2015 #36

Sanders spins the facts when he says campaign did not 'go out and take' Clinton data Gothmog Dec 2015 #55

So it is the Clinton campaign has exploited the software, now could this Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #2

is that the new talking point? grasswire Dec 2015 #5

According to the OP, thought it was strange myself. Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #37

I think it is exactly like he said. He wanted to be able to prove that the breach had occurred. LiberalArkie Dec 2015 #6

++++ Voice for Peace Dec 2015 #9

I agree. We are talking about computer nerds here. They will mess with data just to see JDPriestly Dec 2015 #32

Maybe he can use this for his defense. Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #38

Clinton camp circling the wagons ... Fantastic Anarchist Dec 2015 #14

Nope, not circling the wagons, just waiting for the audit results. Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #39

The author, formerly and admin of the software, said that neither campaign could get far without newthinking Dec 2015 #18

We've discussed this before. JDPriestly Dec 2015 #34

I was commenting on the OP, perhaps responding to the OP where Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #40

If you are talking about the Kroll audit, don't count on it. JDPriestly Dec 2015 #42

All of this does not excuse the fact the breach occurred. Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #43

The breach is the fault of NGP Van. They admit there was a bug in a release on the website. JDPriestly Dec 2015 #49

The NGP Van was nkt fired by Sanders. Who forced Sanders staff members to look at Clinton's Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #50

The staff did not breach the data. They were given permission to search and view the data JDPriestly Dec 2015 #51

Wow. Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #53

Did Sanders fire one of his staff members and suspend two more? Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #52

Very interesting, thanks. SusanCalvin Dec 2015 #3

The document has been pulled from the Internet!! grasswire Dec 2015 #4

I am still getting it LiberalArkie Dec 2015 #7

not me grasswire Dec 2015 #8

It's still there for me. nt SusanCalvin Dec 2015 #10

ditto. n/t JonLeibowitz Dec 2015 #11

Yep, still there. n/t bvf Dec 2015 #45

I just read the article and shared it on Twitter and Facebook underthematrix Dec 2015 #13

This basically shows the analysis by myself and another IT admin was correct. This is POLITICAL not newthinking Dec 2015 #16

Great OP! drokhole Dec 2015 #21

Going off the summary of the log they provided Jarqui Dec 2015 #23

I tend to believe Uretsky's statement about his intent to document the extent of the breach JDPriestly Dec 2015 #29

I can't vouch for every single word Uretsky said. Only a good audit can Jarqui Dec 2015 #35

"It's political not substantive." I agree with the political part. That was the point. pnwmom Dec 2015 #27

Maybe he discovered something so fascinating that he threw caution to the wind. JDPriestly Dec 2015 #30

It really wasn't that big of a deal passiveporcupine Dec 2015 #19

Or rather a BERNghazi! drokhole Dec 2015 #22

I prefer Wassergate! Fuddnik Dec 2015 #25

Ach ja! drokhole Dec 2015 #33

Bad metaphor. Benghazi was where Libyan weapons were stored and from where weapons JDPriestly Dec 2015 #26

Hmmm...not so sure passiveporcupine Dec 2015 #31

Jacobin tries to determine based on the searches what the intent of Bernie's Sanders JDPriestly Dec 2015 #24

If I'm in Uretsky's or the Sanders campaign's boots and I'm concerned with Jarqui Dec 2015 #28

There is something odd about the response to this article. Kalidurga Dec 2015 #41

No. Please just tell me. nt SusanCalvin Dec 2015 #46

The lack of Hillary supporters jumping all over the article Kalidurga Dec 2015 #47

Gotcha. Thanks. nt SusanCalvin Dec 2015 #48

I have the opposite feeling; whenever good points are raised by those qualified to say so, they run. JonLeibowitz Dec 2015 #54

What truely amazes me here is that any campaign is storing sensitive data under the control RichVRichV Dec 2015 #44

This message was self-deleted by its author SunSeeker Dec 2015 #56

Unanswered Questions benjamindavidsteele Feb 2016 #57