Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jarqui

(10,125 posts)
18. No, I'm aware of the media stories on Powell & Rice
Sun Feb 7, 2016, 06:47 PM
Feb 2016

Is there a link or backup to this:

This information which was released by the State Department would be considered by any rational person relevant information by which to evaluate the credibility of accusations, implied or explicit, that Hillary Clinton, in receiving information classified AFTER THE FACT (as were the emails received by Powell and Rice) was engaged in extraordinary and nefarious activities. The reported informaton indicating classified (after the fact) information was received by Powell and Rice is relevant information which shows that Clinton was NOT engaged in unusual and heinous activities. And of course, another thing which the GOP wants suckers to think is that Clinton is Guilty in a matter of State Department officials sending information TO Clinton and which was NOT CLASSIFIED AT THE TIME AND WAS NOT IDENTIFIED AS SUCH AT THE TIME. Somehow it escapes me how Clinton or Powell or Rice would be guilty of RECEIVING information that was SENT TO THEM BY STATE DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL. What were they supposed to do, telepathically know such information which would be classified in the future was about to be sent to them by Dept of State personnel, and call them up, or email them and tell them to NOT send the information?


And links to substantiate this post:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1016143680#post14

From an authority of some kind - something credible.
Yes, it is a good read. Esp after all the lies being posed in gd-p. riversedge Feb 2016 #1
DU posters Floridanow Feb 2016 #4
More likely to come Floridanow Feb 2016 #2
Clinton trying to cling to the other two Secretarys of State is a deception. Jarqui Feb 2016 #3
None of the email was classified. Floridanow Feb 2016 #5
You need to reread my post. It provides a transcript of Jarqui Feb 2016 #6
I think Secretary Clinton knows it was TS at the time Press Virginia Feb 2016 #8
I do not understand her strategy. Did she really think that not coming clean Jarqui Feb 2016 #9
I don't think she's capable of admitting mistakes Press Virginia Feb 2016 #11
I think so as well. This is not a little "oops". It's not a one time thing. Jarqui Feb 2016 #12
From the IG of the Intelligence Community Jarqui Feb 2016 #7
you apparently have your own personal def' of 'deception' contradictory to what every one else means Bill USA Feb 2016 #13
You want to provide a link to that quote. (I doubt it matters... but) Jarqui Feb 2016 #15
it well known that Bernie said:""Nobody wants to hear about your damn emails." Bill USA Feb 2016 #19
Nope Jarqui Feb 2016 #20
LOL! the 1st step in disinformation is to willfully misinterpret the opponents statements. Bill USA Feb 2016 #21
that was not a quote from Bernie - I would have put the statment in quotes - it was my own Bill USA Feb 2016 #22
you should understand that Democrats are not impressed with Punk Talk. Which you have some facility Bill USA Feb 2016 #23
RE your statement: "Powell and Rice did not: - have their own unsecured server".. they had personal Bill USA Feb 2016 #14
Have you got a link to that eyesore? to back it up nt Jarqui Feb 2016 #16
are U being offensive "eyesore"? here are more links in addition to the one in OP, did you read it? Bill USA Feb 2016 #17
No, I'm aware of the media stories on Powell & Rice Jarqui Feb 2016 #18
the para you ask links for cites facts that have been reported numerous times. IF you hadn't been Bill USA Feb 2016 #24
A long winded way of saying "I'm pullin' this out of my a**" and Jarqui Feb 2016 #25
re: comment 14. if you can't be more specific I am not going to begin a private seminar for you.. Bill USA Feb 2016 #27
That might explain ejbr Feb 2016 #10
So she's justifying herself in terms of the Dubya administration? Jester Messiah Feb 2016 #26
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»State Department: Powell,...»Reply #18