Marie Newman vs. the Democratic Machine (Chicago: IL 3rd Dan Lipinski) [View all]
The Nation
Marie Newman Could Shape the Future of the Democratic Party
The congressional candidate in Illinois is challenging incumbent Dan Lipinskis betrayalsand her partys conservative tendencies.
Shes optimistic that voters in a presidential election year will swing in her favor: shes registered some 7,000 progressive voters since the midterms, she won the under-50 set by 21 points, and her district typically sees a 10 percent voter turnout bump during a presidential election year. However, her campaign has a new and
daunting obstacle to face: the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.
This past March the DCCC issued new standards that stop vendors of political servicessuch as strategic consulting, research, and marketingfrom working with primary candidates who challenge incumbents. It essentially created a blacklist: If vendors help a primary challenger, the DCCC will not hire them or recommend them to any of its campaigns. The organization justifies this by referring to its goal of supporting incumbents, maintaining or expanding its House majority, and dedicating resources to endangered or flippable districts. But the effect has been to protect the partys straight white men. That has made it predictably unpopular among rising new stars in the party, like Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and Ayanna Pressley (D-MA), who won their seats by primarying incumbents. But it has teeth. Three vendors have dropped Newmans campaign, and a handful of others dropped out during the vetting process. Its ridiculously expensive to run a campaign, she said. Now we have to throw out a good bit of work
and I have to figure out how to cobble together volunteers to help me out with this, which takes my time and my campaign managers time. Its stressful.
Newmans run
highlights urgent and unavoidable questions about the future of the Democratic Party: Can it encourage new blood, promote diversity, and increase its number of seats while supporting middle-of-the-road incumbents? Should the party embrace a big tent, or is there a place for ideological litmus tests? Will the party be more successful by embracing its progressive wing or hewing more closely to the center? Should being a member of Congress be a job for life? And if the DCCC is truly interested in change, will it be willing to alter its institutional approach to running and funding campaigns?
I asked Newman these questions a few days after the parade, at her home and temporary campaign headquarters in the suburb of La Grange. We sat in a cozy home office, surrounded by stacks of paper, family photos, and a map of the district pinned on the wall. Ziggy, her beagle, sat behind her on the desk chair and snored lightly as we talked.
Her campaign has attracted national attention because she has been vocal about the impact of the DCCC vendor rule and because Pro-Choice Candidate Takes On Anti-Abortion Incumbent makes for a nice headline in a moment when reproductive rights are under attack.