Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Editorials & Other Articles
Showing Original Post only (View all)Block Trump from office with the 14th Amendment's aiding an insurrection exclusion [View all]
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2021/02/16/ban-trump-from-politics-insurrection-exclusion-column/4488397001/Chris Deaton
Opinion contributor
Taking Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell at his word, the buck for former President Donald Trumps incitement of the U.S. Capitol mob should stop somewhere just not in his house. He didnt get away with anything yet, McConnell said on Saturday evening, after enough Republican senators voted to acquit the former president of an impeachment charge. We have a criminal justice system in this country. We have civil litigation. Stipulated. But we still have a Congress, too.
McConnell made the case that Trump was guilty of an offense punishable by more than a Senate floor speech. The upshot of the top Senate Republicans remarks is that he believes Trump is the but-for cause of the Jan. 6 insurrection, whose participants assaulted the Capitol in his name, carried his banners, hung his flags and screamed their loyalty to him. His assessment was plain: Theres no question, none, that President Trump is practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of the day.
Options beyond censure, conviction
The question was left open, though, of who is responsible for penalizing the provocation. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi dismissed the idea of a congressional censure: We censure people for using stationery for the wrong purpose. We dont censure people for inciting insurrection that kills people in the Capitol. McConnells suggestion that district attorneys offices could take it from here if they choose is accurate but it also reveals his perspective that Congress work is finished in the meantime. It shouldnt be. By the GOPs timid standards, McConnells comments and the surprising seven Republican votes for conviction were an authorization for use of political force against the former president. Now, more than at any point in the previous four years, there appears to be a window for bipartisan accountability on Capitol Hill.
If Congress lacked accountability mechanisms other than impeachment or censure, itd be one thing. But its not wanting for options. One of them is enforcement of Section Three of the 14th Amendment, which states that no state or federal office holder who, having previously taken an oath to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.
In other words: No second chance to place your hand on the Bible and repeat after the judge if you were an insurrectionist the first go-round. This novel idea was floated by Sens. Susan Collins, R-Maine, and Tim Kaine, D-Va. It merits widespread consideration now, given how it meshes with the emerging Republican position on Trumps culpability for Jan. 6 and Congress capability for responding to it.
Read the rest......
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2021/02/16/ban-trump-from-politics-insurrection-exclusion-column/4488397001/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My Stuff » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My Stuff » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 1840 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
