Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
In reply to the discussion: Pic Of The Moment: Virginia Is Not For Lovers [View all]calimary
(81,265 posts)31. Since when are you politicians entitled to patrol our bedrooms, sir?
Who died and made you God? And how long will you expect YOUR wife to give YOU blowjobs while you think you're entitled to deny them to everyone else. Or will you just go to some girlfriend on the side? What IS IT with these latter-day Puritans?
Virginia, if you vote for this cretin, you deserve what you get! You're already a laughing-stock state, even for putting this crackpot up for consideration of high office!!! Of course, many of you made sure he got as far as the job he was elected to most recently. WTF?
Sure glad I live in California!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
85 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Such beds and sacks were ENGLISH not American, and appears to be Victorian not Colonial
happyslug
Jul 2013
#28
I was confused, thought that's where you interest lay--the bundling, not the sex. nt
MADem
Jul 2013
#68
Why is this important to you? I don't really care, but do know that my great
sinkingfeeling
Jul 2013
#49
I would expect better of someone with the last name "Cooch..." but he's a Repub. n/t
appal_jack
Jul 2013
#11
no, they only meant that govt should leave corporations alone. our private lives, especially
niyad
Jul 2013
#80
I have been offended and given offense many times, but still haven't married...
Eleanors38
Jul 2013
#38
humina humina! This needs to be discussed with my buddy Edward "Ed" Lillywhite Norton.
AAO
Jul 2013
#24
Any sex act which does not have the potential of producing children . . .
another_liberal
Jul 2013
#26
First they came after the people having anal sex, and I did not protest because....
JPZenger
Jul 2013
#39
No blowjobs? Then what will elected Republicans do in airport men's rooms? nt
onehandle
Jul 2013
#42
1976 SNL Skit - US Supreme Court looks under the sheets to check for illegal sex
JPZenger
Jul 2013
#47
They will of course make exceptions for corporations. While corporations are people, my friend,
tclambert
Jul 2013
#69
Not jobs, not health, not welfare, not environment... but *this* is what they find important.
gtar100
Jul 2013
#77
Virginia is for awkward, 1 minute, missionary sex between a man and woman of the same race.
dairydog91
Jul 2013
#83