Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cab67

(2,992 posts)
3. Beyond my basic literacy and ability to read the peer-reviewed literature,
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 07:16 PM
Sep 2014

I hold a PhD and specialize in vertebrate biology. I work on the evolutionary history of a particular group of vertebrates based on fossil, morphological, and genomic data. That doesn't make me an expert in epidemiology, but I know enough about biology, biochemistry, and statistics to know what does and what does not qualify as a correlation.

I also know enough about the scientific community - I count myself as a member, having been a faculty member at a research university for 15 years - and would regard any claim of a conspiracy, or concerted effort by Powers that Be to silence scientific work, as nonsense. Scientists are temperamentally incapable of keeping things secret for very long. Even private corporations that limit what their employees can say (petroleum exploration or pharmaceutical companies, for example) can't keep things secret as long as non-industry-based funding is available.

If, as Dr. Thompson claims, data were omitted from an earlier paper, they should be published. There are formal mechanisms for doing that. It would be interesting to see how they match up with everything else the whole world has learned since 2004.

What bullshit. cab67 Sep 2014 #1
What's your background? Here's a statement by the CDC scientist in the video. proverbialwisdom Sep 2014 #2
Beyond my basic literacy and ability to read the peer-reviewed literature, cab67 Sep 2014 #3
This post sounds like a different person wrote it, as contrasted with the earlier remarks. proverbialwisdom Sep 2014 #4
This is consistent with my earlier statement. cab67 Sep 2014 #5
Familiar with this? I apologize for the graphics in the video, maybe just close your eyes and listen proverbialwisdom Sep 2014 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author truedelphi Sep 2014 #7
The formaldehyde issue is a non-issue. cab67 Sep 2014 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author truedelphi Sep 2014 #9
You're using a straw man argument cab67 Sep 2014 #11
This message was self-deleted by its author truedelphi Sep 2014 #12
You did mischaracterize my argument. cab67 Sep 2014 #14
Well, then we're done, as it was proven that mercury and formaldehyde were undesirable in terms of truedelphi Sep 2014 #15
This thread is about statements by whistleblower Dr. William Thompson on his own CDC research career proverbialwisdom Sep 2014 #10
And the methodology that is used here is exactly as that described in truedelphi Sep 2014 #13
This message was self-deleted by its author proverbialwisdom Sep 2014 #16
This message was self-deleted by its author truedelphi Sep 2014 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author proverbialwisdom Sep 2014 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author truedelphi Sep 2014 #19
This message was self-deleted by its author truedelphi Sep 2014 #20
IMO, 'supportive' posts containing multiple incorrect and unsourced statements are counterproductive proverbialwisdom Sep 2014 #21
RE: "It would be interesting to see how they match up with everything else..." proverbialwisdom Sep 2014 #22
You might be interested in this summary. proverbialwisdom Sep 2014 #23
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»NEW! Audio of CDC Whistle...»Reply #3