Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
In reply to the discussion: 1968 [View all]reACTIONary
(5,941 posts)25. If you disagree with a....
.... thesis or hypothesis, and do so by calling those who advocate it liers, rather than criticality examining their reasonimg, you are displaying a very weak level of reasonimg yourself .
Being in disagreement with someone is not evidence that they are lying. If you want to make assertions about other's character you should back them ip with some evidence .
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
39 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
1968 Nixon. Less war than Johnson. Don't think war makes your case for you. However,
merrily
May 2016
#10
We could die, and get drafted-- but we couldn't vote----unless you were twenty-one also---------
turbinetree
May 2016
#2
You believe/assume it was not a lie. That is not the same as knowing it was not a lie.
merrily
May 2016
#19
If you disagree with a thesis or hypothesis and do so by calling those who advocate it weak in
merrily
May 2016
#31