Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JHB

(37,180 posts)
19. Here's some more relevant numbers...
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 09:21 PM
Nov 2012

The inflation-adjusted tax rates in 1955:
(via http://www.taxfoundation.org/taxdata/show/151.html)



Look at that! Even if you discount the rates as too high, look at where those bracket thresholds were! In 1955, out of 24 tax brackets, 16 of them affected incomes above the equivalent of $250K for married couples filing jointly. Kind of makes the "is $250K 'rich'?" point moot: it's more than some, less than others, obviously, and we used to treat it that way.

What was he saying about a failed ideology that never worked anywhere in the world? Except "the free world" apparently. (I guess we were "socialists" back then. Imagine how embarrassed the Soviets must have been!)

I guess learning the difference between mixed economies and Stalinist police states is one of those things you learn in college that's too eggheaded for someone who bills $250 million.

And just for kicks, here's a graph of the inflation-adjusted tax bracket thresholds for the last 60 years (It's easy to find charts of the top rate, but tougher to find clear displays about where the burden fell in the past. And remember, this chart doesn't deal with what the rates were, just the breakpoints where one level of income was treated differently from another):

This guy lost me at ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2012 #1
Could be that 'Facts have a liberal bias' thing and it burst their bubble, I dunno know. freshwest Nov 2012 #7
This guy was lying his ass off bjobotts Nov 2012 #25
He is a typical wallstreet conservative kenfrequed Nov 2012 #31
What was that number again? wxgeek7 Nov 2012 #2
that was a great video pipewrench Nov 2012 #3
LOL ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2012 #4
doesn't matter what the numbers say zeemike Nov 2012 #5
That's the truth Plucketeer Nov 2012 #8
That businessman sounded dumber as time went on. I'd love to see DP go a hour or more. freshwest Nov 2012 #6
GEORGE BUSH INHERITED A SURPLUS AND SQUANDERED IT SemperEadem Nov 2012 #9
Intelligent! srichardson Nov 2012 #10
I couldn't watch the video because it was clear, early on, that Pakman's guest was clueless. RVN VET Nov 2012 #11
The numbers don't matter. Classic! MissMarple Nov 2012 #12
thanks for posting my interview! dpakman91 Nov 2012 #13
Great job. cachukis Nov 2012 #14
Here's some more relevant numbers... JHB Nov 2012 #19
BTW, kudos for keeping a straight face with this guy... JHB Nov 2012 #21
That guy is so full of shit he doesn't even know he is full of shit. OverBurn Nov 2012 #15
Ron Paul man here...Ron Paul all the way. n/t vaberella Nov 2012 #16
Ron Paul Man?? bjobotts Nov 2012 #26
You like jumping down someone's throat without getting your facts together. vaberella Nov 2012 #29
That guest was so patronising, treating Pakman like a child. And Pakman slammed him with facts. n/t Prana69 Nov 2012 #17
Denny's doesn't go out and create more demand (interviewer claims they can do so at will) because cui bono Nov 2012 #18
yep, talking points used as filler demwing Nov 2012 #30
UNCERTAINTY? Give me a break! raging moderate Nov 2012 #20
Very True, raging moderate. JDPriestly Nov 2012 #27
Bookmarked for later. silverweb Nov 2012 #22
well done david hourglass1 Nov 2012 #23
Pakman embarrassed that Winger--his neck got redder than a baboon's butt. nt SunSeeker Nov 2012 #24
My advice to the businessmen who can't understand the regulations JDPriestly Nov 2012 #28
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Right-Winger Owned in Eco...»Reply #19