Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

exboyfil

(17,862 posts)
2. Initial conditions are not the same
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 11:00 PM
Jan 2016

Hunter gatherers in the Americas had two continents of mega fauna that had not be exposed to human predation. Of course you had a high growth rate. Animals in Africa, Europe, and Asia had been exposed to hominids on evolutionary time scales. That is why so much more mega fauna survived in those continents than in the Americas.

Hunter gatherers in general are healthier in diet. Grain is inexpensive calories but not as good as a varied hunter gatherer diet. So long as the resources can support the approach, I would take hunter gatherer over farming.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Wyoming»UW study upends understan...»Reply #2