Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Hillary Clinton
In reply to the discussion: Lawrence O'Donnell is going all in saying [View all]TwilightZone
(26,868 posts)45. They might be voting for Hillary, surprisingly enough.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/cbs-poll-hillary-clinton-leads-donald-trump-but-voters-view-both-unfavorably/
51/33 vs. Trump. That's a seriously bad sign for Trump if the trend holds.
51/33 vs. Trump. That's a seriously bad sign for Trump if the trend holds.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
And to do so, he's literally claiming that the Fox News poll has a history of being credible.
Lord Magus
May 2016
#5
I can't stand him, haven't been able to for a long time. He wasn't bad when he was filling in....
George II
May 2016
#14
In some respects that is true, but personally Rachel is too long winded for my taste
still_one
May 2016
#37
I kind of like her little stories. I've learned things I didn't know from them.
lunamagica
May 2016
#50