Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
3. Easier for you, yes.
Thu Sep 11, 2014, 04:32 PM
Sep 2014

But for the number crunchers who need to know which groups might be getting more love or less love than others, they need to identify that.

For example, if Native Americans for any reason, taken as a whole, aren't receiving or applying for anywhere near their "share" of support, based on their known needs and numbers, then the "one checkbox" approach won't help identify that data point.

The boxes are there for reasons. Good reasons, IMO.

And I thank you for doing the application work on their behalf.

Remember, most programs that ask those questions aren't exclusive to those groups. The funder just wants to be able to account for how much those groups receive out of the whole.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Men's Group»Sooo... I'm applying for ...»Reply #3