Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Thursday, 27 June 2013 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)COVERAGE FOR MY YOUNGER KID WAS APPROX $100/MONTH BEFORE THIS SNAFU...WE WILL FIND OUT NEXT MONTH WHAT IT IS NOW, WHEN SHE TURNS 26.
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/young-americans-may-dodge-health-law-2013-06-26
Young Americans may have been among the biggest supporters of Obamacare, but they may also be the least likely to comply with the law.
The architects of health reform say the law will make insurance more affordable and widely available. But in 2014, benefits experts say, the cheapest option for 20-somethings will be to pay the penalty for not buying health insurance, rather than paying for any health insurance at allthat is, provided they dont get sick.
And as more young people do the math, more seem to be deciding the Affordable Care Act isnt such a good deal for them: Support for a national health-care plan dropped nearly 11% among American college freshmen between 2008 to 2012, with under 63% in favor of it today, down from 70%, according to UCLAs annual student survey.
Next year, uninsured Americans must pay a penalty of $95, or 1% of their annual salary if they make more than $9,500 for the year. A person earning $50,000, for example, would pay a $500 penalty if they chose not to enroll in a health insurance plan...for a healthy 20-something who rarely goes to the doctor and doesnt take prescription medications, that penalty might be far less expensive than buying a health plan through the state health exchanges, the new insurance marketplaces opening Oct. 1. Those exchanges, which will offer health coverage to people who cant get it through their employer or by staying on their parents insurance, are just beginning to announce how much their plans will cost. But based on the rates released so far, the price of health insurance for a 20-something will start at about $72 a month in Washington, D.C., and $117 a month in California, for minimal coverage known as a catastrophic plan, available to people under 30.
That means that for someone making less than $86,400 in Washington, D.C., or less than $140,400 in California, even the cheapest health insurance would still cost more than the penalty (a 1% penalty on an $80,000 salary, for instance, would be $800, while the lowest-price insurance in Washington would cost $864 a year and in California, $1,404).
THAT'S BEFORE THE DEDUCTIBLES AND COPAYS...WHICH WOULD MAKE THAT SALARY/BENEFIT SO MUCH WORSE
AND THAT ANALYSIS WOULD APPLY EVEN TO OLDER AMERICANS IN GOOD HEALTH WHO DON'T HAVE A CHRONIC DISEASE REQUIRING MEDICATION AND REGULAR DOCTOR VISITS...I CANNOT IMAGINE ANYONE GETTING ANY KIND OF INSURANCE FOR $800/YEAR. SUCH PRICING DIDN'T EXIST A DECADE AGO.
EPIC FAILURE!