Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: Weekend Economists Revere Two Kings January 16-19, 2015 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)4. Ukraine’s Creditors Grab for the Biggest Pieces of Its Carcass by Eric Zuesse
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/01/ukraines-creditors-grab-biggest-pieces-carcass.html
The lifelong Russia-enemy, George Soros, and the Russian Government itself are now openly fighting over which parts of the Ukrainian Government theyll be getting in the bankruptcy proceeding thats already unofficially starting. Heres the necessary background, so that the battle now occurring on the part of Ukraines creditors can be truthfully and honestly understood:
In December 2013 just before the overthrow of the Russia-friendly Ukrainian Government of Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych, by Soross American President and major political-campaign investment, Barack Obama Russia lent Ukraine $3 billion with a contract saying that if Ukraines debt would rise above 60% of Ukraines GDP, then Russia would be able to demand immediate repayment, and Ukraine agreed to the contracts condition that Ukraine wouldnt pay a cent to any other creditor before the entire due-balance on this $3 billion loan is returned to Russia.
Then, on 4 February 2014, Victoria Nuland of Obamas State Department selected Ukrainian banker Arseniy Yatsenyuk as the person to take control over Ukraine as soon as Obamas Ukrainian coup would occur, which turned out to be 18 days later, on February 22nd.
Soross and Obamas plan was to privatize as much of the Ukrainian Government as possible in a fire-sale of its assets, such as the valuable gas-fields in the Yuzivska region in Ukraines southeast (where the civil war now is), so that Soros and the other investors would be able to get their money back, with interest. Furthermore, inasmuch as only Soros and other insiders would be in on this fire-sale, those same people would also be the bidders; and thus Ukraines assets would be sold to them at prices far lower than their actual worth as economic investments for the future. This would turn their prior Ukrainian bonds into super-discounted equity or stock in what now are Ukrainian Government-owned gas-fields, electrical power companies, factories, etc. Furthermore, Western agribusiness giants are now coming into Western Ukraine to buy up Ukrainian farmland, which is among the worlds most-fertile. The basic privatization-scheme thats being used here had originally been drawn up by the Harvard economist, and the then-World-Bank chief, Lawrence Summers, and by Harvards Economics Department, in the 1990s, as being the way for American insider investors and the U.S.S.R.s Communist Party insiders, to buy the U.S.S.R.s assets dirt-cheap, and thereby profit from the dissolution of the U.S.S.R. Those economists oversaw the sell-offs of industrial and other assets throughout many of the 15 nations comprising the Soviet Union, one of which is Ukraine, where the fire-sales are now occurring.
With this as the background, the worlds great newspaper, German Economic News, headlines, on January 10th (as translated by the present writer into English), Putin v. Soros: Russia Grabs for EU-Billions to Ukraine, and reports that:
Soros has been lobbying very intensively, after the coup (see all about it by clicking on that link), to persuade the EU, IMF and U.S., to donate enough of Western taxpayers money, so as to enable Ukraine to buy enough weapons to win its war against the rebelling portion of Ukraine the region which had voted 90% for the overthrown former President, Viktor Yanukovych the region in Ukraine thats often called Donbass, which is in Ukraines far east, and which has declared its independence, and which includes much of the Yuzivska gas-field. That region has consistently rejected the Obama-coup-imposed Government; and consequently its gas cannot be used to repay Ukraines debts unless Ukraine regains control over that land, where now, almost certainly, even more than 90% of the people reject that Government. (Click here in order to see the transcript of the EU officials phone-conversation in which their Foreign-Affairs Minister Catherine Ashton was informed by her own investigator, on 25 February 2014, that Yanukovych had been overthrown in a violent coup, rather than himself perpetrated the bloodshed, and that Ukraines current President, Petro Poroshenko himself, acknowledged to the EUs investigator at the time that it was a coup which Ashton hadnt known of until that moment.) This is the reason why the IMF informed the coup Government, on 1 May 2014, that unless it could regain control over the rebels land, which means eliminate its residents (since they would never accept a Government that is set upon exterminating them), the IMF would stop lending (actually donating, since these loans will come at the end of the long line in the bankruptcy proceeding thats now inevitable) Ukraine more of its Western taxpayers money. Without those gas-fields and other assets, even the existing IMF loans to Ukraine wouldnt likely ever be able to be paid back. New IMF loans surely wont be.
On 6 January 2015, an aide to Poroshenko announced that, as the news-headline on this story the following day phrased it, Ukraine Says $450 Million Was Stolen from Its Military in 2014. This report also noted that, This amount happens to be precisely the same maximum amount of money that the U.S. Government, in legislation that was supported by more than 98% of U.S. Senators and Representatives and that was signed into law by U.S. President Barack Obama on December 18th, will donate to Ukraines military for this year, 2015. Both Republicans and Democrats in the U.S. Congress overwhelmingly support Obamas ethnic-cleansing program to get rid of the people in that region of Ukraine and thus endorsed the $450 million donation by U.S. taxpayers. However, if the people were hiring to do that job are stealing as much money as were donating to them, then people like Soros could end up losing money on their bond-investments. This is the reason why Soros is pressing the European Union to donate lots more of their taxpayers money to this war. In the 5 February issue of the New York Review of Books, he says, all the consequences of helping Ukraine would be positive. By enabling Ukraine to defend itself, Europe would be indirectly also defending itself. He doesnt mention that Ukraines Government resulted from a coup instead of from the anti-corruption demonstrators in the Maidan, and he portrays Russias President Vladimir Putin as being the aggressor for accepting Crimea back into Russia (where it had been during 1783-1954), and not Americas President Barack Obama as being the aggressor for perpetrating the coup and trying to oust Russias Black Sea Fleet from Crimea. Soros says:
MORE HISTORY AND SUPPORTING LINKS AT OP
-
Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of Theyre Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of CHRISTS VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.
The lifelong Russia-enemy, George Soros, and the Russian Government itself are now openly fighting over which parts of the Ukrainian Government theyll be getting in the bankruptcy proceeding thats already unofficially starting. Heres the necessary background, so that the battle now occurring on the part of Ukraines creditors can be truthfully and honestly understood:
In December 2013 just before the overthrow of the Russia-friendly Ukrainian Government of Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych, by Soross American President and major political-campaign investment, Barack Obama Russia lent Ukraine $3 billion with a contract saying that if Ukraines debt would rise above 60% of Ukraines GDP, then Russia would be able to demand immediate repayment, and Ukraine agreed to the contracts condition that Ukraine wouldnt pay a cent to any other creditor before the entire due-balance on this $3 billion loan is returned to Russia.
Then, on 4 February 2014, Victoria Nuland of Obamas State Department selected Ukrainian banker Arseniy Yatsenyuk as the person to take control over Ukraine as soon as Obamas Ukrainian coup would occur, which turned out to be 18 days later, on February 22nd.
Soross and Obamas plan was to privatize as much of the Ukrainian Government as possible in a fire-sale of its assets, such as the valuable gas-fields in the Yuzivska region in Ukraines southeast (where the civil war now is), so that Soros and the other investors would be able to get their money back, with interest. Furthermore, inasmuch as only Soros and other insiders would be in on this fire-sale, those same people would also be the bidders; and thus Ukraines assets would be sold to them at prices far lower than their actual worth as economic investments for the future. This would turn their prior Ukrainian bonds into super-discounted equity or stock in what now are Ukrainian Government-owned gas-fields, electrical power companies, factories, etc. Furthermore, Western agribusiness giants are now coming into Western Ukraine to buy up Ukrainian farmland, which is among the worlds most-fertile. The basic privatization-scheme thats being used here had originally been drawn up by the Harvard economist, and the then-World-Bank chief, Lawrence Summers, and by Harvards Economics Department, in the 1990s, as being the way for American insider investors and the U.S.S.R.s Communist Party insiders, to buy the U.S.S.R.s assets dirt-cheap, and thereby profit from the dissolution of the U.S.S.R. Those economists oversaw the sell-offs of industrial and other assets throughout many of the 15 nations comprising the Soviet Union, one of which is Ukraine, where the fire-sales are now occurring.
With this as the background, the worlds great newspaper, German Economic News, headlines, on January 10th (as translated by the present writer into English), Putin v. Soros: Russia Grabs for EU-Billions to Ukraine, and reports that:
Just a few days after Angela Merkel cleared the way for a 1.8 billion euro loan from the EUs tax-money for [Ukrainian Premier] Arseny Yaz Yatsenyuk, Russia launched its interest in this money: Moscow is considering to mature a loan it had made to Kiev. Russia makes this move especially against the speculator George Soros.
Ukraines Yaz Yatsenyuk met with Chancellor Merkel, at the Chancellors Office, on Thursday [Jan. 8]. No sooner was the Premier assured by the EU of receiving 1.8 billion euros, than Russia intervenes for the money Moscow may trigger the state bankruptcy of Ukraine.
Russia could use the EU payments to Ukraine to mature a loan that is due at the end of January, and Kiev cannot use its own resources: Moscow could demand early repayment of a three-billion-dollar loan to Ukraine. Ukraine did not meet a number of conditions [of the loan-agreement], reported the Russian news agency RIA Novosti on Saturday [the 10th], citing government sources. Under these circumstances, Russia was forced to insist on the earlier payment.
Ukraines Yaz Yatsenyuk met with Chancellor Merkel, at the Chancellors Office, on Thursday [Jan. 8]. No sooner was the Premier assured by the EU of receiving 1.8 billion euros, than Russia intervenes for the money Moscow may trigger the state bankruptcy of Ukraine.
Russia could use the EU payments to Ukraine to mature a loan that is due at the end of January, and Kiev cannot use its own resources: Moscow could demand early repayment of a three-billion-dollar loan to Ukraine. Ukraine did not meet a number of conditions [of the loan-agreement], reported the Russian news agency RIA Novosti on Saturday [the 10th], citing government sources. Under these circumstances, Russia was forced to insist on the earlier payment.
Soros has been lobbying very intensively, after the coup (see all about it by clicking on that link), to persuade the EU, IMF and U.S., to donate enough of Western taxpayers money, so as to enable Ukraine to buy enough weapons to win its war against the rebelling portion of Ukraine the region which had voted 90% for the overthrown former President, Viktor Yanukovych the region in Ukraine thats often called Donbass, which is in Ukraines far east, and which has declared its independence, and which includes much of the Yuzivska gas-field. That region has consistently rejected the Obama-coup-imposed Government; and consequently its gas cannot be used to repay Ukraines debts unless Ukraine regains control over that land, where now, almost certainly, even more than 90% of the people reject that Government. (Click here in order to see the transcript of the EU officials phone-conversation in which their Foreign-Affairs Minister Catherine Ashton was informed by her own investigator, on 25 February 2014, that Yanukovych had been overthrown in a violent coup, rather than himself perpetrated the bloodshed, and that Ukraines current President, Petro Poroshenko himself, acknowledged to the EUs investigator at the time that it was a coup which Ashton hadnt known of until that moment.) This is the reason why the IMF informed the coup Government, on 1 May 2014, that unless it could regain control over the rebels land, which means eliminate its residents (since they would never accept a Government that is set upon exterminating them), the IMF would stop lending (actually donating, since these loans will come at the end of the long line in the bankruptcy proceeding thats now inevitable) Ukraine more of its Western taxpayers money. Without those gas-fields and other assets, even the existing IMF loans to Ukraine wouldnt likely ever be able to be paid back. New IMF loans surely wont be.
On 6 January 2015, an aide to Poroshenko announced that, as the news-headline on this story the following day phrased it, Ukraine Says $450 Million Was Stolen from Its Military in 2014. This report also noted that, This amount happens to be precisely the same maximum amount of money that the U.S. Government, in legislation that was supported by more than 98% of U.S. Senators and Representatives and that was signed into law by U.S. President Barack Obama on December 18th, will donate to Ukraines military for this year, 2015. Both Republicans and Democrats in the U.S. Congress overwhelmingly support Obamas ethnic-cleansing program to get rid of the people in that region of Ukraine and thus endorsed the $450 million donation by U.S. taxpayers. However, if the people were hiring to do that job are stealing as much money as were donating to them, then people like Soros could end up losing money on their bond-investments. This is the reason why Soros is pressing the European Union to donate lots more of their taxpayers money to this war. In the 5 February issue of the New York Review of Books, he says, all the consequences of helping Ukraine would be positive. By enabling Ukraine to defend itself, Europe would be indirectly also defending itself. He doesnt mention that Ukraines Government resulted from a coup instead of from the anti-corruption demonstrators in the Maidan, and he portrays Russias President Vladimir Putin as being the aggressor for accepting Crimea back into Russia (where it had been during 1783-1954), and not Americas President Barack Obama as being the aggressor for perpetrating the coup and trying to oust Russias Black Sea Fleet from Crimea. Soros says:
Putins ambition to recreate a Russian empire has unintentionally helped bring into being a new Ukraine that is opposed to Russia and seeks to become the opposite of the old Ukraine with its endemic corruption and ineffective government. The new Ukraine is led by the cream of civil society: young people, many of whom studied abroad and refused to join either government or business on their return because they found both of them repugnant. Many of them found their place in academic institutions, think tanks, and nongovernmental organizations. A widespread volunteer movement, of unprecedented scope and power unseen in other countries, has helped Ukraine to stand strong against Russian aggression.
MORE HISTORY AND SUPPORTING LINKS AT OP
-
Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of Theyre Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of CHRISTS VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
77 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It’s time we reconsidered the principle that states must always repay their sovereign debt
Demeter
Jan 2015
#2
WAPO: Holder limits seized-asset sharing process that split billions with local, state police
Demeter
Jan 2015
#19
The Elvis Presley coverup: What America didn’t hear about the death of the king
DemReadingDU
Jan 2015
#48
As young minds leave, industrialized eastern Ukraine faces brain drain | Al Jazeera America
MattSh
Jan 2015
#31
Ukrainian men are jumping the ship for the Russian shores ahead of mobilization deadline - Fort Russ
MattSh
Jan 2015
#32
Russia may lift food import ban from Greece if it quits EU - Russian agriculture minister
Demeter
Jan 2015
#70