Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

progree

(10,904 posts)
16. Whatever you do, don't read any books or articles on finances or investing
Thu Dec 6, 2018, 09:55 AM
Dec 2018

because the authors cannot know your specific situation, and you have no ability to apply what you read to your own personal situation.
{sarcasm}.

Paying someone to give you the standard much-worn allocation advice, like your equity percentage should be 110 minus your age, is what will help you the most. {sarcasm}

(Not paying someone and instead having some white-shoe type working on commission or earning fees from what (s)he sells is even worse).

As for myself, FWIW, I am retired, and my life expectancy is about 18 years, and no market downturn has lasted that long. More like 2-7 years on average. So I'm mostly in equities. Simulations by many authors over the years in the AAII Journal and elsewhere have shown that portfolios heavy in equities last longer than those mostly in bonds or cash. In these simulations, the standard withdrawing of 4% of one's portfolio in the first year of retirement, and increasing that dollar amount each year thereafter by the rate of inflation, is tested. A variety of scenarios are tested -- lower/higher withdrawal rates, lower/higher inflation rates, lower/higher average returns, etc.

One recent book that you shouldn't read because the author doesn't know you is "Investing at Level 3" by James Cloonan. Rather than yet another tiresome book parroting conventional wisdom, he actually looks at the data. (That said, past performance does not guarantee future results).

Yes, the risk of doing living expense withdrawals while stocks are down is scary. On the other hand, more likely one would be withdrawing while stocks are high, but nobody talks about that. That said, even Cloonan advises having some allocation to fixed income and cash-like investments for living expenses in market downturns. (Interestingly, that's a form of market timing, but nobody seems to notice that).

My rants and rave --
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=2212402
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1121&pid=1306

We pulled out of the market the minute that orangeshitgibbon took office. Canoe52 Dec 2018 #1
Where are you investing now? Duppers Dec 2018 #2
Money market funds, or you can do a cd ladder as rates are going up. brush Dec 2018 #29
What kind of rates are you getting on your cd's? PoindexterOglethorpe Dec 2018 #31
My most recent rate was 2.2% but with the rates being raised it should be ihgher... brush Dec 2018 #32
That's my problem with cd's. PoindexterOglethorpe Dec 2018 #33
Some of that "return" is return of principal? progree Dec 2018 #34
Oh, I know how cd's work. PoindexterOglethorpe Dec 2018 #36
I agree with you on equities vs. bonds and CDs. My problem is with comparing the yield of progree Dec 2018 #38
That is very true. You can't really compare the two without PoindexterOglethorpe Dec 2018 #39
Yeah, I get Social Security too and income from a charitable gift annuity, so I know what you mean. progree Dec 2018 #40
My cd strategy is temporary until the market volatility eases. brush Dec 2018 #35
Not all of my portfolio is in the annuities. PoindexterOglethorpe Dec 2018 #37
Two things to consider. 3Hotdogs Dec 2018 #3
That's what we've been doing for the last 40yrs. Duppers Dec 2018 #5
Take the money out. You will sleep better at night. 3Hotdogs Dec 2018 #7
Thank you! 🙏 Duppers Dec 2018 #11
If you are retired, most of your money should not be in the stock market. marylandblue Dec 2018 #4
Thanks! Right now its half and half. Duppers Dec 2018 #6
There are some rules of thumb for allocation marylandblue Dec 2018 #8
Agree with the previous post, after retirement one should be out of anything risky anyway. Canoe52 Dec 2018 #9
I like the way you think. 😉😄 nt Duppers Dec 2018 #12
Short term treasury bills are where the world's wealthy put money for safety. empedocles Dec 2018 #26
bonds, the old safety group, may get volatile, and even risky. empedocles Dec 2018 #23
True, so far this year, bond funds haven't been any safe haven -- VBMFX down 1.9% YTD progree Dec 2018 #24
US Treasury Bond yields from about '72 to '81, went from 5% to 15% empedocles Dec 2018 #25
Good point. I remember some of that - back in like 1981 the financial seminar teacher progree Dec 2018 #28
This message was self-deleted by its author lastlib Dec 2018 #13
With the inversion of the treasury yield curve, short-term bonds would be safer..... lastlib Dec 2018 #14
That's conventional wisdom, but comes with some caveats Major Nikon Dec 2018 #22
+1,000 !! CountAllVotes Dec 2018 #27
That probably depends on when you expect to need the money. IphengeniaBlumgarten Dec 2018 #10
This message was self-deleted by its author A HERETIC I AM Dec 2018 #15
Progree is right. A HERETIC I AM Dec 2018 #19
Actually I think we were both right to some extent, and both wrong to some extent progree Dec 2018 #20
Whatever you do, don't read any books or articles on finances or investing progree Dec 2018 #16
Thank you so much!! Duppers Dec 2018 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author A HERETIC I AM Dec 2018 #18
I want to repeat what Progree says in the threads he linked to: PoindexterOglethorpe Dec 2018 #21
My husband retires in 12 days. Croney Dec 2018 #30
Why are you assuming a pending recession? PoindexterOglethorpe Jan 2019 #41
Consider a simple 3 or 4 fund portfolio IronLionZion Jan 2019 #42
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Personal Finance and Investing»Need advice: should we ri...»Reply #16