Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

kristopher

(29,798 posts)

5. They don't need nuclear. In fact, it would be counterproductive.

Reply to LouisvilleDem (Reply #4)

Tue Aug 30, 2016, 09:40 AM

Aug 2016

The field of economically viable options that exists today is radically different than it was even ten years ago. Choosing nuclear now would be both economic idiocy and climate madness.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

California is about to find out what a truly radical climate policy looks like [View all] tinrobot Aug 2016 OP

Damn, you gotta love a progressive, democratic state packman Aug 2016 #1

Really ? DustyJoe Aug 2016 #2

The increase in forest fires impacts California air quality. eom PufPuf23 Aug 2016 #3

The next paragraph was interesting LouisvilleDem Aug 2016 #4

They don't need nuclear. In fact, it would be counterproductive. kristopher Aug 2016 #5

No, we won't consent to nuclear, we're too well-informed to fall for that. nt bananas Aug 2016 #6