Environment & Energy
Showing Original Post only (View all)Spontaneous separation of californium and curium. [View all]
The environmental tragedy now commencing in the United States means that future generations will be even more challenged to address severe environmental issues than they would have been had the United States constitution prevented the installation of an insane administration.
The insanity exists however, and those of us who can in the United States should not abandon our pursuit of knowledge, however much science may be threatened by the anti-intellectual bent of the mob that has seized control of the United States in defiance of Democracy.
If we have learned nothing in the last two decades about addressing climate change, it is that so called "renewable energy" cannot stabilize the atmosphere. This is demonstrated by the incontrovertible fact that the expenditure of trillion dollar sums on this failed technology has had no effect whatsoever on the unrelenting increase in climate change forcing gases.
We're at 406,14 ppm this week, 3.52 ppm higher than last year.
Although we have left a great mess for all future generations, one thing that they may not appreciate is that we have left them is sufficient fully isolated uranium to provide for all of the world's energy demands for many generations to come, as well as technology that can make access to uranium inexhaustible beyond several centuries, with rather less than dire environmental impact. A relatively small amount of uranium is capable of eliminating all the world's energy mines, all of the coal fields, all of the gas fields, fracked and traditional, and all of the world's oil fields.
For the overwhelming bulk of this uranium to be utilized, it will need to be converted to plutonium, utilizing, among other things, existing plutonium inventories (including weapons grade plutonium which must be denatured and rendered impossible to use in nuclear weapons.)
Right now, and for the immediate forseeable future, most of the world's nuclear reactors utilize the thermal neutron spectrum which is many ways undesirable, but it's what we have for now, at least until the fine upcoming generation of nuclear, chemical, and materials science engineers can apply their intellects to change this state of affairs, as we must hope they will.
Continuously recycled plutonium in a thermal cycle, according to one reference, (Ref: Nuclear Reactor Physics, William E. Stacy, Wiley and Sons 2001. pg.234) will consist of an isotopic mixture having roughly 8.17% 238Pu, 45.10% 239Pu,
20.54% 240Pu, 18.57%, 241Pu, and 7.62% 242Pu. These figures show - they are probably only valid as a first approximation - that plutonium can be readily transformed into a form totally unsuitable for weapons use, owing to the heat load associated with 238Pu and 241Pu which decays in situ to 241Am.
However the transuranium isotope distribution will not be limited to plutonium in this state of affairs (which is less sustainable than fast spectrum fission reactors, which can supply all human energy needs indefinitely.) Among the transuranium elements, working from the same reference, only 51% will be represented by plutonium. Roughly 5% will be neptunium, 9% will be americium, 34% will be curium, with smaller amounts being represented by californium and berkelium.
As I noted earlier in a post here, the accessibility of high oxidation states makes the separation of plutonium, neptunium, and americium from traditional used nuclear fuels, almost all of which are based on oxides of the actinides. Neptunium and americium are the key to generating 238Pu to eliminate the value of plutonium for weapons diversion.
In the case of americium, however, an intermediate in the production of 238Pu is 242Cm. The other curium isotopes will also be present, and what's more, inevitably, this curium will also be contaminated with californium. Because of californium's high rate of neutron production, it is desirable to separate it from other elements both to utilize this spontaneous flux, and to simplify the handling of curium for the recovery of its heat.
Neither californium nor curium however exhibit stable higher oxidation states. This means that while they are easily separated from the lower actinides, they are more challenging to separate from one another; in general (especially since in general only small amounts are produced today), one must resort to procedures like chromatography.
All of this is why I read with interest today a paper detailing a spontaneous separation of curium and californium.
The paper is here: Inorg. Chem., 2015, 54 (23), pp 1139911404 "Spontaneous Partitioning of Californium from Curium: Curious Cases from the Crystallization of Curium Coordination Complexes"
Some text from the paper:
Actually the "general perception" of 5f is not really valid, but no matter.
A little more on uses for curium:
Some remarks on separations:
We recently communicated a few features of the curium(III) tris-chelate, 2,6-pyridinedicarboxylate (dipicolinic acid, DPA) complex, Cm(HDPA)3, as a part of a comprehensive study that compared middle actinides with californium.(16-18) Herein, we substantially expand on our analysis of this complex as well as elucidate the structure and properties of the bis-chelate complex [Cm(HDPA)(H2DPA)(H2O)2Cl]+.
They ran some crystallizations and to their surprise found that the crystallization process lead to the separation of tiny amounts of californium complexes from curium complexes.
Here's the picture of the crystals:
Esoteric, I know, but cool. They'll need to know these sort of things in the future if they wish to save themselves from what our irresponsibility has done.
Enjoy the coming week.