Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

FogerRox

(13,211 posts)

21. Grist specially states the chart represents a smaller model

Reply to kristopher (Reply #13)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 03:51 PM

Apr 2012

Secondly dont bother answering my point about the market. Lower price points will rule the day.

"if you want to see those nukes put out of business, we need 23 gigs of 24/7 renewables in the market place"

So what is your better idea?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

41 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

World is ignoring most important lesson from Fukushima nuclear disaster [View all] bananas Apr 2012 OP

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ orpupilofnature57 Apr 2012 #1

OH BROTHER!!!! PamW Apr 2012 #2

You have an amazing ability to completely miss the obvious point kristopher Apr 2012 #3

POOR COMPREHENSION!!! PamW Apr 2012 #4

At least you admit it. kristopher Apr 2012 #5

The designers at Fukishima did not use "probability theory" correctly Kolesar Apr 2012 #6

Are you a freeper? Flat out no orpupilofnature57 Apr 2012 #7

Actually I AM answering the question PamW Apr 2012 #15

Actually you just make the OP author's point kristopher Apr 2012 #19

Nuclear is not unique PamW Apr 2012 #23

Yes nuclear IS unique. kristopher Apr 2012 #27

More like PamW Apr 2012 #37

Extremely High Consequence kristopher Apr 2012 #38

It's amazing... just amazing... isn't it? n/t SpoonFed Apr 2012 #39

And as far as your Flippant example... orpupilofnature57 Apr 2012 #8

Flipping 10 heads in a row: joshcryer Apr 2012 #14

Nope, renewable enrgy-anti nuke groups are not exploiting FogerRox Apr 2012 #9

You are locked into an inaccurate mental model of power systems kristopher Apr 2012 #10

Appeasing the 1% is the only thing keeping orpupilofnature57 Apr 2012 #11

Thats wonderful of you, in a condescending and authoritative manner FogerRox Apr 2012 #12

Here is where you went off target kristopher Apr 2012 #13

Grist specially states the chart represents a smaller model FogerRox Apr 2012 #21

No, Grist doesn't say that. kristopher Apr 2012 #26

LOl, Yes Grist does, I already quoted them just for you. FogerRox Apr 2012 #32

You didn't quote anything kristopher Apr 2012 #34

See the quotebox in comment #12? FogerRox Apr 2012 #35

Like I said about making things up kristopher Apr 2012 #36

The problem is. PamW Apr 2012 #17

Wrong Way Pam strikes again... kristopher Apr 2012 #18

Your're done FogerRox Apr 2012 #30

What is it that you don't have a clue about? kristopher Apr 2012 #33

Yes, mismatch sucks FogerRox Apr 2012 #29

Enlighten me.... PamW Apr 2012 #16

"Enlighten" you? kristopher Apr 2012 #20

My mind is open... PamW Apr 2012 #25

I hate to side with Kris but WOW FogerRox Apr 2012 #22

Dodged question` PamW Apr 2012 #24

Would you settle for a 500Mw solar plant? FogerRox Apr 2012 #28

Normally I use 20% in 20 years FogerRox Apr 2012 #31

Not really. The most important lesson is STILL that in a 9.0 earthquake and in a 15 meter NNadir Apr 2012 #40

Ghastly sentence structure Kolesar Apr 2012 #41