Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

procon

(15,805 posts)
3. To do nothing is better?
Sat May 5, 2018, 02:30 PM
May 2018

There will always be the well meaning naysayers and doom and gloom crackpots trying to forestall change, but consumers, entrepreneurs, and developers won't be denied. Who knows what advances we will see a decade from now. Look at any start up industry that evolved from scratch, like computers, or the auto industry, they took decades to achieve acceptance and become prosperous since the first warehouse-sized computer and the horseless carriage.

I live a few miles away from the Mojave Wind Farm, the third largest onshore project in the world and the largest wind farm in the US. I can see them from my house and since they first went up in the 70s, the turbines keep evolving, getting more efficient with each new generation. In the opposite direction is a huge solar array, and they are continually expanding to meet demand.

We're still way behind the curve, but the alternative to wind and solar is not a viable option.



The increased use of wind and solar energy will drive innovation. procon May 2018 #1
It will drive waste. The remark that this industry is in "infancy" is delusional. NNadir May 2018 #2
To do nothing is better? procon May 2018 #3
Infancy stage??? Really? hunter May 2018 #6
Chronology is probably not the best comparison to offer. procon May 2018 #7
Even if wind turbines were perfect machines lasting 100 years without service... hunter May 2018 #9
I mentioned innovation above because there is need procon May 2018 #10
"wind turbines will match the lifetime of the Surry Nuclear Station in 104 years" Nitram May 2018 #4
Not a complet and fair and complete comparison between Wind Turbines and Nuclear Plant. mackdaddy May 2018 #5
Nuclear power plants have had consistently the highest capacity utilization of energy systems... NNadir May 2018 #12
I wonder why you cherry-picked one nuclear plant ... GeorgeGist May 2018 #8
Presumably, more than 45 years later, we could build something more durable. hunter May 2018 #11
I'm not sure this is true, since the infrastructure has been destroyed by ignorance and greed. NNadir May 2018 #16
This post originated with a comment on Dominion's decision to build gas plants to go "renewable." NNadir May 2018 #13
Should you not include the time and cost of safely decommissioning Ghost Dog May 2018 #14
The climate scientist Jim Hansen has done this... NNadir May 2018 #15
Incapable of seeing the forest for the trees... Finishline42 May 2018 #17
If wind turbines could be bought as seeds that you could plant like trees... hunter May 2018 #18
The use of wind and solar increases the cost of coal and nat gas Finishline42 May 2018 #19
For grid applications battery capacity is measured in minutes. hunter May 2018 #20
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Average Lifetime of Danis...»Reply #3