Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

kristopher

(29,798 posts)

36. Sure it is.

Reply to PamW (Reply #35)

Thu Apr 19, 2012, 07:41 PM

Apr 2012

It is when you were posting as Dr.Gregory before that alias was served a pizza.

Have you heard the bull**** claim that "renewables are great but they aren't enough"?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=115x258338

See also:

Are TX &SC nuke projects going the way of Calvert Cliffs?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=115x262032

Three answers // 5 reactors started 1 completed // largest municipal bond default in history
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=115x262570

TVA has lost $50 Million Cutting Brown's Ferry Output - Tennessee River Too Hot To Cool Plant
Dr gregory on albedo
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=115&topic_id=256645#258337

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

36 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Vermont Yankee: A Nuclear Battle Over States’ Rights [View all] xchrom Apr 2012 OP

No brainer PamW Apr 2012 #1

Safety isn't the only area where nuclear is subject to regulation Pam kristopher Apr 2012 #2

Because a power plant runs it is preventing the construction of other power plants? zeaper Apr 2012 #3

And doesn't even sell power to the state? FBaggins Apr 2012 #4

Where is that argument made? kristopher Apr 2012 #5

It's right in your post. FBaggins Apr 2012 #6

That is no where in my post kristopher Apr 2012 #7

I'm impressed that you're tri-lingual FBaggins Apr 2012 #8

They can reject a renewal of the time limited permission to operate. kristopher Apr 2012 #9

You missed the fact that the court ruled otherwise, eh? FBaggins Apr 2012 #10

Nope. kristopher Apr 2012 #12

Let's take these arguments apart one by one PamW Apr 2012 #14

. XemaSab Apr 2012 #11

WRONG AS ALWAYS!! PamW Apr 2012 #13

We'll see how familiar you are with the nature of regulation kristopher Apr 2012 #15

Undestandable PamW Apr 2012 #16

"By his own admission in his posts" kristopher Apr 2012 #17

For the record... PamW Apr 2012 #18

That is a very distorted view of events kristopher Apr 2012 #19

National Academy of Sciences. PamW Apr 2012 #20

NAS put it stronger PamW Apr 2012 #21

To repeat for comparison kristopher Apr 2012 #22

LIES, LIES, and more LIES PamW Apr 2012 #23

I said this "project" began in 2007, Pam. And it did. kristopher Apr 2012 #24

GO TO THE LIBRARY! PamW Apr 2012 #25

All of the papers produced are listed at the National Academy Press kristopher Apr 2012 #26

NOPE!!! PamW Apr 2012 #27

Links proving your statement false kristopher Apr 2012 #28

DIVERSION!!! PamW Apr 2012 #29

The paper you claim to have been citing STILL doesn't exist. kristopher Apr 2012 #30

PUT UP or SHUT UP!!! PamW Apr 2012 #31

I showed where you have knowingly made a long list of false claims kristopher Apr 2012 #32

I KNEW IT - a COMPLETE DODGE!!! PamW Apr 2012 #33

Where is the reference Pam? kristopher Apr 2012 #34

Not a single exchange PamW Apr 2012 #35

Sure it is. kristopher Apr 2012 #36