Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Showing Original Post only (View all)California Utilities Balk as Home Solar Producers Near 5 Percent Limit [View all]
http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/02/california-utilities-balk-as-home-solar-producers-near-5-percent-limit/California solar produced on rooftops is about to breach the next limit of 5 percent of aggregate customer peak demand. The effect could be to sunset the incredible growth of distributed solar rooftop power in the state, as utility payments are ended for future rooftop solar production.
Why is there a limt? Because utilities in California must pay homeowners who generate clean power for the grid. Net metering gives solar customers fair credit on their utility bills for the power they generate. There is a five percent cap on the amount of net metering that utilities must make available to customers. That limit was already raised once a couple of years ago, from about half that amount.
The state regulators at the CPUC have proposed closing that loophole and requiring utilities to calculate net metering participation in a way that permits more participation by more customers. Once there is more than five percent provided theres no guarantee that utilities will continue to credit new solar customers for their contribution to cleaning the grid with their rooftop solar.
Most solar in California like most urban states is on grid: that is, the grid is the battery. Everyone who puts solar on their roof contributes to the grid, and is credited for their contribution, and takes from the grid, for example, at night, and is debited for that. Its like rollover minutes for solar.
<more>
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
32 replies, 5035 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
32 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The issue is a public policy vote by the California Public Utilities Commission
kristopher
May 2012
#4
Actually I am explaining the facts as they exists today in California
ProgressiveProfessor
May 2012
#5
Bullshit, that isn't an answer any more than your earlier comments addressed the OP.
kristopher
May 2012
#14
You sacred cow is gored...I think it needs another injection of hyperbole...
ProgressiveProfessor
May 2012
#19
Because I do not toe his line WRT to renewal energy and offer instead a more rational approach
ProgressiveProfessor
May 2012
#18
It does illustrate the level of ridiculousness that has blighted DU lately, no?
NickB79
May 2012
#21