Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Showing Original Post only (View all)Fuel cell demonstrates 10,000 hours (equiv to 300,000 miles) [View all]
Last edited Thu Jun 27, 2013, 12:09 PM - Edit history (1)
http://www.hybridcars.com/cost-effective-uk-fuel-cell-tests-as-durable-as-diesel-engine/Things are getting pretty exciting. Wind is now a very significant part of our electricity supply -- approaching 5% and growing rapidly. Solar is approaching the financial break-even point where it could take off the same way. There is absolutely no reason for any new electrical plant other than solar, wind, or geothermal. We are already at the point of being able to supply all net additional electricity from wind alone. As this accelerates, we can start retiring nuke plants and the worst coal plants, converting some of the other coal plants to gas to supply the energy float needed when wind and solar are slow.
This is all happening much faster than most people realize. We are potentially about 5 years away from the time when a battery-only car will be an excellent choice for most families as their second around-town car. One factor that is rarely reported is that maintenance on electric-only cars is nearly zero. You have to replace tires, and that's about it. After 8-10 years, you might have to replace the battery, but along the way, no oil changes, no tune-ups, no muffler replacements, no bad oxygen sensors, etc. This is huge, and it is so rarely discussed.
And it seems like fuel cells are really approaching practicality in the 10-year horizon.
Somebody reported that the Energy Depart still projects > 99% of vehicles will have an internal combustion engine by 2035. I don't see how anybody could make such a prediction with all of this movement underway.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
21 replies, 2418 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (15)
ReplyReply to this post
21 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I think your implication is that wind and solar will continue their current rate of growth
wtmusic
Jun 2013
#4
A concentrated deployment of wind turbines will never, ever, ever supply 100% of needs.
wtmusic
Jun 2013
#6
Half of the units are stopped because they're either broken, or the wind isn't blowing.
wtmusic
Jun 2013
#12
People who invest in turbines need to have a reasonable expectation of profits
BlueStreak
Jun 2013
#21
After Record 2012, World Wind Power Set to Top 300,000 Megawatts (300GW) in 2013
kristopher
Jun 2013
#11