Carbon-Free Energy Is Possible -- Without Nukes

[PamW]

25. Good for the goose; good for the gander

madokie states
Your problem is you think you're always right and everyone else is always wrong.

Because when it comes to Physics; I AM right. Physics is my profession; so I am damn certain to get it correct.

Wouldn't you expect a medical doctor to be correct all the time when the questions are ones of simple anatomy?

The type of Physics questions that you get 100% WRONG on multiple occasions are TRIVIAL to someone with my intellect and education.

I know that galls you; but facts are facts.

Also I happen to like those links from Dr. James Hansen who states that we can't run our electric grid on renewables only; and that anyone that so believes would believe in the "Easter Bunny and Tooth Fairy".

I've been saying here that we need to address the global climate problem, that renewables won't do it; and that nuclear power is the answer. Dr. James Hansen has made those EXACT points in recent weeks.

So why can't you and other anti-nukes accept what legitimate scientists say?

For Heaven's sake, you've pilloried the Republicans for not listening to the scientists. The Republicans didn't like what the scientists said with regard to global warming, and you and others rightfully attacked them as not being too bright.

However, when the tables are turned and now the scientists say something that you don't like; well that's a different story.

NOPE - what's good for the goose is good for the gander.

PamW