Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
29. Yeah! You don't understand.
Sun Dec 29, 2013, 09:05 PM
Dec 2013

It's classified.

caraher
response to PamW

51. bananas and kristopher certainly win on source credibility here

Unlike any of us asserting unverifiable credentials on this board, it's easy to tell that Selden is immune to the oft-leveled charge of not being a SCIENTIST or bomb designer, as he is both. From his NNSA bio:

ROBERT SELDEN is currently a private consultant in defense science and research management. He retired in 1993 as an associate director at the Los Alamos National Laboratory. His career in the DOE national laboratories began at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in the 1960s when he was one of the two participants in the Nth Country Experiment to design a nuclear explosive from unclassified information. After moving to Los Alamos in 1979, he served as the Division Leader of the Applied Theoretical Physics Division, as Associate Director for Theoretical and Computational Physics, and as the first Director of the Los Alamos Center for National Security Studies. Dr. Selden served as the Chief Scientist of the U.S. Air Force from 1988 to 1991 where he received the Air Force Association’s Theodore von Karman Award for outstanding contributions to defense science and technology. He has been a member of the Strategic Advisory Group to the Commander of the United States Strategic Command since 1995. Since 2003 he has served as Chairman of the Advisory Group's Stockpile Assessment Team, which has the responsibility to conduct a detailed annual review of the United States nuclear weapon stockpile. He also is currently a member of the Joint Advisory Committee on Nuclear Surety to the Secretaries of Defense and Energy. He was a member of the Air Force Scientific Advisory Board from 1984 to 2005. Dr. Selden received his BA degree from Pomona College, Claremont, California, in 1958, and his Ph.D. degree in Physics from the University of Wisconsin in 1964.



PamW:
Response to caraher (Reply #51)Thu Dec 5, 2013, 01:48 PM

52. NOPE!! They do NOT!!

caraher,

The key point is that Selden RETIRED in 1993.

When you retire; you don't have access to the CLASSIFIED information any more.

It was about 1993 that the CLASSIFIED techniques to insure that IFR can NOT be used for weapons were developed.

I don't care how many awards someone gets; even if they get the Nobel Prize in Physics.

If they no longer have the CLEARANCE to know HOW the IFR can achieve weapons-free capability;
then they just plain DO NOT KNOW.

PamW



caraher

Response to PamW (Reply #52)Thu Dec 5, 2013, 02:05 PM

53. Well, it seems you are a liar, traitor or a fool - your choice

If you're telling us that classified information proves IFR poses no proliferation risk, you are a traitor to your country by revealing the existence of classified information.

If this information does not exist, your are telling lies.

If you think any sane person should prefer to accept your unverifiable claims over the considered opinion of a man who spent a decades-long career studying these issues, is still an active consultant on these questions and worked on these problems at the highest levels of the scientific nuclear security establishment, you are a fool.


If PamGregG actually has a clearance, it wouldn't last long if they knew of the erratic behavior on display here; the shrinks would have a field day with the breakdown of reason involved in his narratives.

For example:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/112758716
This message was self-deleted by its author elocs Dec 2013 #1
Nuclear makes it far more difficult kristopher Dec 2013 #2
National Renewable Energy Lab's 'Renewable Electricity Futures Study' kristopher Dec 2013 #3
"Our report became the basis of President Carter's energy policy." bananas Dec 2013 #4
I believe things are different today; take the of evaluation of the CEO of NRG kristopher Dec 2013 #5
BS alert here 4dsc Dec 2013 #6
Care to educate us? n/t cprise Dec 2013 #7
It's likely the same old spin FBaggins Dec 2013 #8
What is carbon "free" PamW Dec 2013 #9
So is making cement madokie Dec 2013 #13
I don't think that's it. kristopher Dec 2013 #10
I'll take your word for it. FBaggins Dec 2013 #11
No, I support a 'path' that is well documented as most effective kristopher Dec 2013 #12
Well documented by WHO? PamW Dec 2013 #14
We can start with posts #1 & #3. kristopher Dec 2013 #16
NO such thing has been established PamW Dec 2013 #18
No, I'm saying you aren't a scientist because you falsely report the results of research and data. kristopher Dec 2013 #19
My reporting is ACCURATE PamW Dec 2013 #20
ROFLMAO kristopher Dec 2013 #21
How do you come to the conclusion that everyone who doesn't agree with you madokie Dec 2013 #22
You misunderstand.. PamW Dec 2013 #23
Show me a link where I got it wrong madokie Dec 2013 #24
Good for the goose; good for the gander PamW Dec 2013 #25
Well the goose didn't find any links to back up your absurd statements madokie Dec 2013 #26
PamW you're always throwing around all this about how you're a scientist and all madokie Dec 2013 #27
Evidently madokie doesn't understand PamW Dec 2013 #28
LOL Sure you do madokie Dec 2013 #30
Yeah! You don't understand. kristopher Dec 2013 #29
The pseudo scientist has about wore me out madokie Dec 2013 #31
We can't all be geniuses... PamW Dec 2013 #33
LOL madokie Dec 2013 #34
Nothing erratic PamW Dec 2013 #32
Nice straw man apporach to your failed attempts 4dsc Dec 2013 #15
You're funny. kristopher Dec 2013 #17
Cost-minimized combinations renewables powering the grid up to 99.9% of the time kristopher Dec 2013 #35
Not a good reference Searay60 Dec 2013 #36
It's an outstanding reference kristopher Dec 2013 #37
Read The Paper Again Searay60 Dec 2013 #38
As I wrote, it's an outstanding reference. kristopher Dec 2013 #39
Kristopher Searay60 Dec 2013 #40
Those are baseless claims kristopher Dec 2013 #41
My posts was factual, practical and experienced. Searay60 Dec 2013 #42
It's amazing... kristopher Dec 2013 #43
You Think A Lot Of Your Self Searay60 Dec 2013 #44
Yeah, yeah yeah... kristopher Dec 2013 #45
LOL Searay60 Dec 2013 #46
Unfortunately... PamW Dec 2013 #47
Talking to yourself again? kristopher Dec 2013 #48
Not at all PamW Dec 2013 #49
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Carbon-Free Energy Is Pos...»Reply #29