Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Oneironaut

(5,493 posts)
9. Starts by poisoning the well, gets even more ridiculous.
Thu Dec 24, 2015, 01:37 PM
Dec 2015

1 - "The beams didn't melt" is a red herring. Structural beams wouldn't have to melt to cause a structural failure. The only thing that is required is that their strength is diminished.

2 - "Propaganda from..." That well is just toxic now. Once again, nothing of substance here.

3 - "No one thinks that jet fuel can melt jet beams" - according to who? Was a survey taken with an adequate sample size?

4 - A demonstration about metal losing strength and snapping isn't relevant when the WTC beams gave away and caused the building to collapse? Was he expecting a full scale model?

The rest- everyone is stupid, blah blah. Standard truther crap.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»For the Unthinking Fuckwi...»Reply #9