Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LadyHawkAZ

(6,199 posts)
5. Bookmarking this site for further reading
Sat Jun 2, 2012, 06:39 PM
Jun 2012

Thank you for posting this. "Sex-pozi" has become the radfem-PC term for "slut", and it annoys me no end.

The difficulty is that many people mistake enthusiasm for sex with sex positivity. In my view, sex-positivity is the view that the only relevant measure of a sexual act, practice, or experience is the consent, pleasure, and well-being of the people engaged in it or the people affected by it.


Yes. I see a lot of this attitude: "But I like sex! I have a husband/partner/lover and we have GREAT sex, so that means it's OK for me to judge how YOU enjoy sex! Because I don't hate sex!"- no, it doesn't work like that. The idea that consensual adult sexuality is normal and pleasurable no matter what the particular quirks of the people involved- that it is in fact a positive force- that's what makes a person sex-positive. Not just a liking for their particular method.

Charlie Glickman and Sex Positivity [View all] stevenleser Jun 2012 OP
To me, this informs not just my feminism, but my pro-LGBTIQ rights beliefs stevenleser Jun 2012 #1
Thanks Steven libodem Jun 2012 #2
I dont remember any offense, but same here, hope you have forgiven me as well... stevenleser Jun 2012 #3
Great libodem Jun 2012 #4
Bookmarking this site for further reading LadyHawkAZ Jun 2012 #5
Thank you for your excellent comments stevenleser Jun 2012 #6
Important. And it's important that sex positive individuals not be bullied into silence. Warren DeMontague Jun 2012 #7
As I understand sex positivism, I'm probably sex positive to an extreme. Zorra Jun 2012 #8
Well, for one, I highly doubt ANYONE is advocating prostitution of underage people. Warren DeMontague Jun 2012 #9
I have this book called Sex in History by Reay Tannahill. Neoma Jun 2012 #10
I think, in some ancient civilizations, it was a religious activity. Warren DeMontague Jun 2012 #11
Probably because of STD's. Neoma Jun 2012 #12
rationally, STDs may have been part of the biblical hang ups around sex Warren DeMontague Jun 2012 #13
Tricking some arrogant, greasy fool is never a religious experience for any Zorra Jun 2012 #14
I'm just telling you what ive read... Warren DeMontague Jun 2012 #15
LOL! You're a real hoot! But... Zorra Jun 2012 #16
No, you're reading WAY too much into it. Warren DeMontague Jun 2012 #17
I think I agree with the way Mr. Glickman puts it: stevenleser Jun 2012 #18
IMO, sex is way overrated. If religions didn't spend so much time and energy repressing Zorra Jun 2012 #19
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Feminists»Charlie Glickman and Sex ...»Reply #5