Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ancestry/Genealogy

In reply to the discussion: Family Search.org [View all]
 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
7. Yeah, I would be very very careful of any information you get from unsourced family trees
Mon Nov 27, 2017, 04:11 AM
Nov 2017

Last edited Tue Nov 28, 2017, 09:50 PM - Edit history (1)

you should try to independently verify anything you discover, since a lot of people make wild leaps and impossible connections based on nothing more than a similarity of names.

And if your ancestors have been in the South since the 1600's then it's almost certain that you'll probably find at least some slave owners in your family tree...the various branches of my family were mostly 17th century Southern colonists, in Maryland and Virginia, with a few ending up in the Carolinas and Kentucky; from what I can tell, collectively, my ancestors between them probably owned at least a thousand slaves...and the odds are pretty good that any African-American who has my (uncommon, English-origin) surname is probably a descendant of slaves owned by my ancestors/relatives. All of which are things I wasn't really aware of back when I started with geneaology, although I suppose I should probably have expected it.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Ancestry/Genealogy»Family Search.org»Reply #7