Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Pro-Gun Voices in Congress Are Open to Bullet Capacity Limits [View all]gejohnston
(17,502 posts)25. civil liberties should be the same across the board
it should be shall issue for everyone, unless it violates the Federal Firearms Act and the Gun Control Act, or no issue to everyone.
IL is wrong only because it gives politicians "security guard" permits. I would be OK with IL if the law applied to Chicago aldermen as well as everyone else. I'm OK with Vermont and Texas. NY has no standards at all, just convince the local authority or live in the right county. Same with California.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
50 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
NYT may be in error: The Conn murderer Did in fact switch mags several times...
Eleanors38
Feb 2013
#4
Thanks for the corrections. I don't use guns as much as you so I don't give a shit about the lingo.
upaloopa
Feb 2013
#41
How mentally ill do you mean? Someone being treated doing well on SSRI anti-depressants? An
uppityperson
Feb 2013
#14