Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
17. I also reviewed garrick's posts and saw diddly worth
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 12:38 AM
Jun 2014

alerting on.

There is a concerted effort to cleanse DU of pro-2A Democrats, esp. if they are outspoken. The gross abuse of GD's TOS is only part of this. IMO, the Ads' sympathies are completely with the banners, but they don't want to look "un-Democratic" by instituting an outright ban on any suggestion of pro-2A presence, so they allow the smear, animosity, and abuse to continue in a vain attempt to somehow drive out pro-2A Democrats.

It hasn't worked, and it won't work.

The only reasons I haven't been booted, I believe, are because I have enough "ignores" that the dynamic garrick experienced fails to reach critical mass with me , and because I pull enough the banners up short by describing in detail the crappy motives behind their stigma campaign. Enough DUers see this & won't go with the promiscuous alerts any longer.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Oklahoma governor unexpec...»Reply #17