Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: CeaseFire employee/gang member charged with kidnapping and rape [View all]friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)46. Sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander
Never serve up a dish you don't care to eat yourself.
If gun owners who do no wrong are expected to wear the misdeeds of the ones
that do, you lot can damn well wear the misdeeds of those amongst you that
do wrong.
To hell with your double standards and hypocrisy.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Well, he would be a subject matter expert on criminal use of firearms. (nt)
blueridge3210
Jul 2014
#1
So do you expect every employer to monitor their employee's activities outside of work?
Bjorn Against
Jul 2014
#5
I guess I should rephrase that, we don't know if it was immediate but it did happen shortly after
Bjorn Against
Jul 2014
#9
orly? The daily google-dump is nothing more than an effort to highlight the misdeeds of one person
Nuclear Unicorn
Jul 2014
#41
He was fired. Period. He is no longer an employee, your subject line is false.
Bjorn Against
Jul 2014
#6
Fine. I'll happily stipulate that CeaseFire is no worse than the NRA
friendly_iconoclast
Jul 2014
#8
CeaseFire is run by well-meaning ninnies, NRA's board is downright malevolent
friendly_iconoclast
Jul 2014
#11
I don't like everyone on the board, but that does not make them criminals.
Bjorn Against
Jul 2014
#15
I just showed you a few he's committed (not that he'll likely be charged with any)
friendly_iconoclast
Jul 2014
#23
So you now acknowledge there is no evidence of wrongdoing and they do some good work
Bjorn Against
Jul 2014
#30
Well I suppose we now know the real reason for his opposition to armed individuals.
ileus
Jul 2014
#34
excluding those crimes punishable by imprisonment related to the regulation of business practices
gejohnston
Jul 2014
#48