Regarding his point #4 - that pure fun is an under-reported reason for owning a gun, I agree wholeheartedly. Then he goes off the rails when he gets into defensive gun use - cowardly describing Dr. Gary Kleck as a "breathtakingly shitty criminologist" sans any real evidence supporting his smear:
1) He essentially represented Kleck as standing alone with regard to the proposition of high numbers of defensive gun use, when in fact numerous surveys (over a dozen) support his findings; including that of pro-restriction "scholar" Philip Cook:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles/165476.pdf
2) He's also unaware, or covers up the fact that Kleck won the highest award that the American Society of Criminology bestows for his book Point Blank -- largely dedicated to defensive gun use.
3) He cites a lightweight hack like David Hemenway as "evidence" to "debunk" Kleck's work.
Then there's this little gem:
But don't pretend that gun is a guarantee of safety -- gun owners are actually at greater risk of homicide and suicide than the general population.
"But don't pretend that gun is a guarantee of safety......"
Very few do. Strawman -- and a flimsy one at that.
"......gun owners are actually at greater risk of homicide and suicide than the general population."
Trotting out the oft-times eviscerated Kellerman "study". Good job fella.
No wonder one of our illustrious members expressed pride in being the first to rec this thread.