Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: More scaremongering about centerfire .22's... [View all]Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)4. I would assume you can use both, depending on your target
It works well for suppressing fire if you have to, but its very easy to switch to single shot for a target far away.
If the military had somebody shooting at them from 300 yard, they are not going to give up and run away. They will do the best they can. They can still shoot one shot a second at 300 yards, and be accurate enough.
Or to put it another way. Older rifles, like the M14 were good up to 600 meters, but were heavy and could not carry as much ammo.
M16's were lighter, and still effective up to 300 meters.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
37 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You are approximately five times more likely to win the lottery than be murdered by a .223 cal rifle
the band leader
Jul 2015
#8
+1. Once again, verifiable truth is shown to be superior to mere weight of verbiage
friendly_iconoclast
Jul 2015
#12