Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

fifthofnine

(20 posts)
9. I believe....
Wed Jul 22, 2015, 10:58 PM
Jul 2015

...it would legally be "civilians enforcing law". By using the NICS, they would be enforcing federal and/or state law requiring a background check and they would be learning if another civilian could legally purchase a firearm. If the NICS check came back "negative" they could not, under the law, sell the firearm to that person. I am unsure how that could be seen as "a civilian not enforcing the law"

As far as those with an FFL...they are, I believe, acting as "agents" for the government and therefore are not "civilians" while conducting their business.

Perhaps the next time I speak with an attorney I know, I will ask his opinion on this issue. I would love to see an attorney opine on this thread.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Should NICS be available ...»Reply #9