I'm not sure which is more insulting [View all]

[discntnt_irny_srcsm]

On one hand...

...there is the assumption by many pro-control folks that a gun purchased for self-defense will almost never be used for that purpose.

OTOH...

...there is the assumption that, if guns banned altogether, most or all of those wounded or killed by a gun today (including suicides) would be unscathed.

So, for you, if you're pro-gun, which is more insulting?

4 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
	The assumption that a gun, acquired for protection, will never ever be used defensively
	1 (25%)
	The assumption that at least most injured or killed these days by guns (including suicides) would be alive and healthy if guns were banned
	3 (75%)
	0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided.
Show usernames Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll