Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: What's wrong with gun-"control"? [View all]discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,595 posts)53. One point at a time
Get rid of all weapons capable of holding more than about 3 rounds.
If you're really expecting that to happen sooner than never and not at all, you're terribly naive.
Severely restrict who can obtain one at all.
Several states have constitutions echoing the personal right of self-defense and the conjunction of the 2A and 10A in the federal give the same result. I don't know of almost anyone who would deny a right of self-defense which really ought to include rights to the most efficacious tool for the job.
Change liability laws to hold people personally responsible for their weapons, including how they are stored.
I thought, perhaps incorrectly, that gun owners now have liability for injuries and damage they cause.
Oh, and most of this will require that the 2nd be extensively modified if not repealed.
I should mention here that it is my considered opinion that changing of eliminating any of the Bill of Rights is tantamount to forming a new country. (I think you may need an incredible number of guns to make that happen.)
And that will require that we have a major change in our cultural attitude about the value and utility of violence as a primary solution to conflict.
If you believe that laws will affect a change in collective "cultural attitude", I have a bridge to sell you.
I will point out lastly that 3 rounds will be a tremendous handicap to the police and military.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
81 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If you don't support a federal ban on asssault weapons you should be a republican
bowens43
Dec 2016
#1
And it would help if certain Democratic politicians, Joe Manchin comes to mind,
guillaumeb
Jan 2017
#58
If you can't rebut this info., you're saying that you have to be a moron to be a Democrat.
pablo_marmol
Jan 2017
#34
California is out-of-step with Oregon and Washington, and is hurting Democrats nationally.
pablo_marmol
Jan 2017
#35
You do realize that AR-15's and whatnot are common and legal in Canada and Europe, yes?
benEzra
Jan 2017
#69
That's true, but the semi-auto is more efficient at that process making it more effective,
SlimJimmy
Jan 2017
#38
My general definition of a semi-auto is a weapon that automatically loads the next round.
SlimJimmy
Jan 2017
#72
Look up the Diamondback DB9 (9mm) and tell what's not very concealable about it.
SlimJimmy
Jan 2017
#76