Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Peer Review [View all]gejohnston
(17,502 posts)41. there is a bit difference between
needing to have perfect technical terms, and having a fucking clue what you are talking about. "cop killer bullet" and "gun show loophole" is like "death tax" and "socialized medicine" in buzz wordiness.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
See post 4 and attempt to reply with substance, assuming that's not too much trouble. n/t
TPaine7
Jun 2012
#9
I know what he means, as well. Unfortunately for both of you- he's wrong. See post #27
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2012
#28
The genetic fallacy again, eh? It doesn't matter where it was posted, he's still wrong.
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2012
#36
Of course it matters where information comes from. Guncite is a propaganda site.
DanTex
Jun 2012
#37
And you've yet to prove me wrong. I admit Kopsch's testimony is hearsay...
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2012
#38
There still are plenty of bullets available that will penetrate body armor- rifle bullets.
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2012
#40
Unfortunately for you, that source directly contradicts your claims.
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2012
#27
Yes! Do you think that valid points will stop being made because you express displeasure?
TPaine7
Jun 2012
#18
I wish he would ignore this whole group. He has already done me the favor of ignoring me and life
Tuesday Afternoon
Jun 2012
#45