Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

trouble.smith

(374 posts)

21. What Sen. Schumer wants is not reasonable gun control, he wants incremental gun control

Reply to SecularMotion (Original post)

Wed Oct 3, 2012, 02:10 AM

Oct 2012

Last edited Fri Oct 5, 2012, 08:45 AM - Edit history (1)

which eventually and inevitably leads to complete abolition of second amendment rights. it's a football game and they're just moving the ball down the field trying to score the game winning touchdown. similarly, it's our job to stop their momentum, seize the ball, and run it into our end zone for the ganme winning TD. There's no compromising in this game, there's only the game.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

30 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sen. Schumer says there should be ‘reasonable limits’ on the Second Amendment [View all] SecularMotion Sep 2012 OP

I wish the google dumpers and Missycim Sep 2012 #1

Is it okay to take guns away from spouses who beat up their husband or wife? rfranklin Sep 2012 #3

Ok I will ask you again Missycim Sep 2012 #4

I said what I think is reasonable...try not evading the question this time... rfranklin Sep 2012 #5

I have yet to hear what you think, Missycim Sep 2012 #6

Most gun prohibitionists here strive mightily to avoid saying what they *really* want,.... friendly_iconoclast Sep 2012 #17

it is already federal law gejohnston Sep 2012 #11

so, you favor taking the gun after the homicide? rfranklin Sep 2012 #12

don't believe in due process? gejohnston Sep 2012 #13

The Fifth's due process clause is everyone's door mat, whether right or left. nt Eleanors38 Sep 2012 #16

Typically yes we wait until a crime has occurred before the sentencing phase. 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #15

Do you activly support the Brady Campaign or the VPC? oneshooter Oct 2012 #28

Senator Schumer has never seen a restrictive gun-related bill that he didn't like slackmaster Sep 2012 #2

Freedom is not an object Reasonable_Argument Sep 2012 #7

we already have 100's or unreasonable limits....what more do they really want? ileus Sep 2012 #8

Hundreds more, of course Oneka Oct 2012 #19

Schumers idea of reasonable limits is the same as any and all limits. nt LARED Sep 2012 #9

Self-defense is an unalienable/inalienable right and government can never have the authority to take jody Sep 2012 #10

Everyone supports reasonable limits on gun ownership 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #14

His "reasonableness" is never-ending! Nt Eleanors38 Oct 2012 #23

I support reasonable limits on the 2A. Remmah2 Oct 2012 #18

But jbgood1977 Oct 2012 #20

Which ones would those be? nt hack89 Oct 2012 #22

Just a few off the top of my head jbgood1977 Oct 2012 #29

All excellent choices. nt hack89 Oct 2012 #30

What Sen. Schumer wants is not reasonable gun control, he wants incremental gun control trouble.smith Oct 2012 #21

And to think, there was virtually nothing like this culture war Eleanors38 Oct 2012 #24

Okay, then... krispos42 Oct 2012 #25

Chuck won't be... discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2012 #26

This was actually much tamer than I expected. Atypical Liberal Oct 2012 #27