Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Veterans

Showing Original Post only (View all)

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
Fri May 10, 2013, 09:06 AM May 2013

The Single Most Expensive Piece Of Military Equipment Ever Has Reached A Massive Milestone [View all]

http://www.businessinsider.com/uss-gerald-r-ford-huntington-ingalls-2013-4?op=1



The Single Most Expensive Piece Of Military Equipment Ever Has Reached A Massive Milestone
Robert Johnson | Apr. 18, 2013, 12:02 PM

The lead ship in a new class of carriers, the USS Gerald R. Ford, is the most expensive piece of military equipment ever created. And it now has a perfectly-laid flight deck that could one day see 6th generation fighters screeching across its surface.

The Ford will run about $11.5 billion, with three ships costing about $40.2 billion.

Even given these generous estimates, the Navy figures that the USS Gerald R. Ford could cost as much as $1.1 billion more than planned, making it far and away the service's most expensive warship.

Bloomberg reported the Ford's rising costs in August, when planners understood their worst-case assessment would put the carrier at about 21 percent over its target cost (via Hampton Roads).



unhappycamper comment: "The Ford will run about $11.5 billion, with three ships costing about $40.2 billion."

This camper bets that the USS Gerald R Ford will consume the better part of $40.2 billion dollars. Psst - the price of this one went over $13 billion within the last week.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Veterans»The Single Most Expensive...»Reply #0