HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Religion & Spirituality » Religion (Group) » Consciousness: often even... » Reply #16

Response to cpwm17 (Original post)

Sat May 10, 2014, 12:27 PM

16. While his explanation makes some sense when describing the biologic entity that is a person,

he really offers nothing to promote the idea that consciousness is purely and only a part of that biologic entity.

Since no one has ever offered evidence that it is or isn't, it remains one of the great unanswered questions. There may be a time in the future when it can be answered, but then again, it may not be.

And while most agree on how that the biologic entity is conceived and what happens to it after death, there is clearly no agreement on what happens to that other part (assuming it may not be a part of the biologic entity).

I think I follow your reasoning about everything possible happening an infinite number of times in a truly infinite multiverse, but we seem very, very far from understanding that as well.

I'm glad Dr. Dawkins has found the answers that make sense to him, but he is no more correct about this than those who carefully explain what happens to a person's soul after death.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 59 replies Author Time Post
cpwm17 May 2014 OP
unblock May 2014 #1
longship May 2014 #2
cpwm17 May 2014 #5
unblock May 2014 #6
cpwm17 May 2014 #9
skepticscott May 2014 #11
cpwm17 May 2014 #13
Igel May 2014 #14
cpwm17 May 2014 #20
unblock May 2014 #34
AleksS May 2014 #51
cpwm17 May 2014 #59
skepticscott May 2014 #35
cpwm17 May 2014 #36
intaglio May 2014 #3
skepticscott May 2014 #4
cpwm17 May 2014 #8
skepticscott May 2014 #10
cpwm17 May 2014 #12
Humanist_Activist May 2014 #41
edhopper May 2014 #7
LiberalAndProud May 2014 #15
cpwm17 May 2014 #21
LiberalAndProud May 2014 #24
cpwm17 May 2014 #40
LineReply While his explanation makes some sense when describing the biologic entity that is a person,
cbayer May 2014 #16
cpwm17 May 2014 #22
cbayer May 2014 #23
Warren Stupidity May 2014 #25
pinto May 2014 #17
cbayer May 2014 #18
pinto May 2014 #19
arcane1 May 2014 #26
cbayer May 2014 #27
arcane1 May 2014 #28
cbayer May 2014 #29
arcane1 May 2014 #30
cbayer May 2014 #31
arcane1 May 2014 #32
Jim__ May 2014 #48
cbayer May 2014 #49
cpwm17 May 2014 #33
cbayer May 2014 #37
cpwm17 May 2014 #38
cbayer May 2014 #39
Warren Stupidity May 2014 #52
Humanist_Activist May 2014 #42
cbayer May 2014 #43
Humanist_Activist May 2014 #44
cbayer May 2014 #45
Humanist_Activist May 2014 #46
cbayer May 2014 #47
cpwm17 May 2014 #50
Humanist_Activist May 2014 #53
cpwm17 May 2014 #54
Humanist_Activist May 2014 #57
cpwm17 May 2014 #58
WovenGems May 2014 #55
cpwm17 May 2014 #56
Please login to view edit histories.