Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

In reply to the discussion: Bible Question [View all]

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
32. I was referring to consistency among groups, not consistency within individuals
Thu Oct 8, 2015, 09:29 AM
Oct 2015

The Emerson quote was one of my father's favorites who like Emerson, was a Unitarian minister. My father used it in at least one sermon where he taught that religion should always be independently validated by each individual and we should never take for granted what someone else tells us to believe, or not believe. When asked what to believe he would always say it's up to you to figure that one out. I'm not sure if many religionists who are not Unitarians or subscribe to certain far eastern theologies would care for that philosophy much, though.

As far as all those people you mentioned, with the exception of one we have independent verification the writings(or at least the vast majority of writings) attributed to them are genuine. So it makes it a much simpler matter to derive understandings of their works. In the case of Jesus, some of the biggest debates among theologians concern whether biblical passages can actually be attributed to him, and biblical historians often debate whether any of it can be.

Anyone can be misunderstood, so I don't really attribute that quality to greatness. YMMV.

Bible Question [View all] Angry Dragon Sep 2015 OP
incest. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2015 #1
incest with whom?? Angry Dragon Sep 2015 #3
And in that same exact vein... trotsky Sep 2015 #2
Blasphemer!!!! JoePhilly Sep 2015 #4
I can not find any reference to those things you mention in the Bibles I have Angry Dragon Sep 2015 #5
Maybe he did TlalocW Sep 2015 #6
oh, oh, oh, plus, Voldemort is a pretty smart guy Goblinmonger Sep 2015 #9
. rug Sep 2015 #7
thanks for the clip Angry Dragon Sep 2015 #8
The literalist answer is that Eve bore unnamed "other sons and daughters” (Gen 5:4). rug Sep 2015 #11
........... Angry Dragon Sep 2015 #16
How do you tell which parts of the bible are to be taken literally and which are not? Major Nikon Oct 2015 #28
That is a complex question and one that theologians goldent Oct 2015 #29
Which essentially means the bible says whatever you want it to say Major Nikon Oct 2015 #30
It is a complex book and there are no rules as to how you interpret it. goldent Oct 2015 #31
I was referring to consistency among groups, not consistency within individuals Major Nikon Oct 2015 #32
He doesn't do that. Answering questions would expose the hypocrisy. cleanhippie Sep 2015 #18
he gave me a nice answer ........ see above Angry Dragon Sep 2015 #19
Well damn. Maybe hell has frozen over or something. cleanhippie Sep 2015 #20
Or maybe you have perception problems. rug Sep 2015 #21
Adam & Eve were nothing but lab rats, an experiment Warpy Sep 2015 #10
I was too young to remember it, but Hayduke Bomgarte Sep 2015 #12
Well either they had sex with their mother, or. . . actually, that's it. mr blur Sep 2015 #13
Pesky time stamps. Your attempt at snark results in simple plagiarism. rug Sep 2015 #14
The answer to that question: LostOne4Ever Sep 2015 #15
I have heard that before Angry Dragon Sep 2015 #17
Simple answer Act_of_Reparation Oct 2015 #22
So the Bible is kind of like bronze age fanfic? Fumesucker Oct 2015 #23
More of like a bronze age fanfic compendium. Act_of_Reparation Oct 2015 #24
Pedant.... Fumesucker Oct 2015 #25
Bronze age fanfic compendium. SheilaT Oct 2015 #27
Adam & Eve were his lab rats Warpy Oct 2015 #26
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Bible Question»Reply #32