Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
I thought you said they were supposed to be tolerated in this country. Cuthbert Allgood Oct 2017 #1
Do you really not understand that you are talking about 2 different topics? guillaumeb Oct 2017 #2
The confusion comes from you, g. trotsky Oct 2017 #5
No, the apparent confusion seems to be limited to a very few in this group. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #9
So in this instance you are keenly aware of the nuances Lordquinton Oct 2017 #16
LOL!!! n/t trotsky Oct 2017 #21
And the choir is in near perfect harmony. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #25
Um, so do you understand that putting "eom" on the end of your subject line... trotsky Oct 2017 #26
I do, but I do make mistakes. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #28
Sure. trotsky Oct 2017 #29
So can I expect an apology for the few times you have accused me guillaumeb Oct 2017 #31
I am sorry that I ever accused you of claiming to define Christianity. trotsky Oct 2017 #35
I am amazed. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #36
As I figured. trotsky Oct 2017 #37
I admitted that I cannot remember which of the things that I said guillaumeb Oct 2017 #38
OK, I'll naively play along. trotsky Oct 2017 #39
I should have remembered that one. And it was my error. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #40
And look! YOU APOLOGIZED AND YOU'RE STILL ALIVE! trotsky Oct 2017 #41
The end of theism is a metaphorical description of the numerous posts guillaumeb Oct 2017 #52
As long as we're on the topic Pope George Ringo II Oct 2017 #68
"a metaphorical description" trotsky Nov 2017 #71
While you're at it... trotsky Oct 2017 #44
I might ask why your posts are not entered into your journal? But I do not care. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #53
I don't use the journal feature, so I fail to see why that matters. trotsky Nov 2017 #70
An interesting attack you made, guillaumeb Nov 2017 #79
The real reason for asking for links? Lordquinton Nov 2017 #75
Post removed Post removed Nov 2017 #76
This message was self-deleted by its author guillaumeb Nov 2017 #82
Accusing me of being dishonest? guillaumeb Nov 2017 #83
You certainly have the privilege of using the self-delete function. Mariana Nov 2017 #84
It is an attempt to frame by claiming that using the function is an attempt to hide something. guillaumeb Nov 2017 #85
Not a penalty. nt. Mariana Nov 2017 #86
Of course not. guillaumeb Nov 2017 #88
No, they aren't. Mariana Nov 2017 #89
No? Read this: guillaumeb Nov 2017 #90
Lolololololololololo Lordquinton Nov 2017 #92
No Lordquinton Oct 2017 #48
Not true at all. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #54
That's not a definition. Pope George Ringo II Oct 2017 #65
No, you have defined atheism for others Lordquinton Oct 2017 #67
Were you not one who also claimed that I define Christianity for others? guillaumeb Oct 2017 #56
Did I stutter? Lordquinton Oct 2017 #66
So you persist in this statement. Which misdefines my own expressed beliefs. guillaumeb Nov 2017 #77
No misidentification here Lordquinton Nov 2017 #91
I said that I was not a literalist. guillaumeb Nov 2017 #94
Nice try Lordquinton Nov 2017 #104
Okay. I concede that you have convinced yourself. eom guillaumeb Nov 2017 #109
So everyone who has called you out on this Lordquinton Nov 2017 #111
"Everyone" in your context is a handful. guillaumeb Nov 2017 #113
That is a way to describe the people reading this group Lordquinton Nov 2017 #122
A few of the people. guillaumeb Nov 2017 #124
So what? Lordquinton Nov 2017 #127
Side note: this is an attempt at reframing Lordquinton Nov 2017 #125
Shenanigans. 😀 sprinkleeninow Nov 2017 #143
Literalists can and do gum up the works. IMO. EOMMM. sprinkleeninow Nov 2017 #106
The pope gums up the works? Lordquinton Nov 2017 #112
I'm befuddled. Which doesn't take much.😤 sprinkleeninow Nov 2017 #115
The pope is a biblical literalist Lordquinton Nov 2017 #123
I'm sorry. Say that again? S-l-o-w-l-y, please. sprinkleeninow Nov 2017 #138
I don't know how planer I can say it Lordquinton Nov 2017 #151
Thee pope. sprinkleeninow Nov 2017 #155
I can't speak fully to your points Lordquinton Nov 2017 #161
You guys appreciate nuance? sprinkleeninow Nov 2017 #168
This is interesting, but if you do not wish to respond, I understand. eom sprinkleeninow Nov 2017 #139
So you have nothing? Lordquinton Oct 2017 #47
No, the reframing is obvious here. guillaumeb Nov 2017 #87
Like how you reframed that one question Lordquinton Nov 2017 #93
Except that I did not. guillaumeb Nov 2017 #95
Still maintaining that story? Lordquinton Nov 2017 #105
Sure, g. trotsky Oct 2017 #20
I'm not confused at all. Cuthbert Allgood Oct 2017 #14
You still sound confused. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #32
I'm not the one confused. Cuthbert Allgood Oct 2017 #45
Reminds me of a quote from a famous sailor. trotsky Oct 2017 #46
Define many people? guillaumeb Oct 2017 #55
Well, since this is a discussion here Cuthbert Allgood Nov 2017 #74
I was taking issue with your initial wording. guillaumeb Nov 2017 #81
Scores of clergy across Tennessee. Mariana Oct 2017 #3
True story Pope George Ringo II Oct 2017 #24
Yeah, great. Act_of_Reparation Oct 2017 #4
GOOD NEWS, EVERYONE! n/t trotsky Oct 2017 #6
... Act_of_Reparation Oct 2017 #7
What an amazing coincidence. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #8
Thats Professor Farnsworth of Futurama and his catchphrase Rob H. Oct 2017 #17
When everyone says you're wrong for exactly the same reason... Act_of_Reparation Oct 2017 #18
Do not conflate a tiny group of frequent posters guillaumeb Oct 2017 #27
So when I say "everyone"... Act_of_Reparation Oct 2017 #42
So when you write "everyone", guillaumeb Oct 2017 #59
This is the part where I say "I can only define it for myself", right? Act_of_Reparation Nov 2017 #69
Use his weapons to your advantage. trotsky Nov 2017 #72
Well said. eom guillaumeb Nov 2017 #78
Gil, if your posts are being misunderstood all the time Mariana Oct 2017 #50
Look at my many posts in other areas, guillaumeb Oct 2017 #60
You take very generic position marylandblue Nov 2017 #96
An interesting analysis. guillaumeb Nov 2017 #97
Maybe banal or trivial is a better description than generic marylandblue Nov 2017 #100
I find such questions as "should we tolerate Nazis" to be pointless. guillaumeb Nov 2017 #101
There is a long history of argument and misunderstanding among you and other posters marylandblue Nov 2017 #103
A good observation. eom guillaumeb Nov 2017 #108
Allow me to add this to my response: guillaumeb Nov 2017 #102
Wow, so now it's an Internet conspiracy against you? trotsky Oct 2017 #22
And the choir is in near perfect harmony. eom guillaumeb Oct 2017 #10
Okay, here is a different voice. marylandblue Oct 2017 #11
How's that new catch phrase going? Lordquinton Oct 2017 #15
Writing a good catch phrase can be hard. Act_of_Reparation Oct 2017 #19
Bad news: Even more praised it. MineralMan Oct 2017 #12
But it was scores of them, MineralMan. Mariana Oct 2017 #13
How many are there? guillaumeb Oct 2017 #33
It's enough to make SCORES statistically insignificant. Mariana Oct 2017 #49
So do you feel we should reject those with whom we agree? guillaumeb Oct 2017 #57
Build alliances with scores of religious leaders? Mariana Oct 2017 #61
We can build bridges, or build walls. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #62
Frankly, I'm not interested in building bridges Mariana Oct 2017 #63
Then we clearly disagree on tactics. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #64
Better ways to talk a LOT of these white people down off the ledge rather than calling them evil. AtheistCrusader Oct 2017 #23
Feel free to discuss the ways you do so. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #34
It's simple. You ask them if they would respond to a Breast Cancer fundraising/awareness campaign AtheistCrusader Oct 2017 #43
I agree. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #51
Then why did you categorize this as "good news"? trotsky Nov 2017 #73
Denunciation of intolerance is good news. eom guillaumeb Nov 2017 #80
So denouncing those people's behavior as evil is good news. Mariana Nov 2017 #98
Denouncing racism and white supremacy IS good news in my opinion. guillaumeb Nov 2017 #99
guillaubeb saidsimplesimon Oct 2017 #30
Denouncing white nationalists is not a good act? guillaumeb Oct 2017 #58
Hiya. You just wrote something that may go over sprinkleeninow Nov 2017 #107
An excellent suggestion. guillaumeb Nov 2017 #110
Wise sage. (Heheh.) sprinkleeninow Nov 2017 #114
Do you think this bit is working? Cuthbert Allgood Nov 2017 #116
Please clarify what 'bit'. sprinkleeninow Nov 2017 #117
I don't even know why I'm on here. sprinkleeninow Nov 2017 #118
What. The bit about the wise sage or my take on sprinkleeninow Nov 2017 #119
They spend a lot of time talking past each other marylandblue Nov 2017 #120
IF you call it a positive act, guillaumeb Nov 2017 #121
No marylandblue Nov 2017 #126
An arbitrary and personal definition. guillaumeb Nov 2017 #128
Don't you believe that all definitions are arbitrary and personal? marylandblue Nov 2017 #130
When we are talking of labels, yes, they can be. eom guillaumeb Nov 2017 #131
Then you shouldn't have a problem if someone marylandblue Nov 2017 #132
Not even the same topic. guillaumeb Nov 2017 #133
I don't think you have sympathy for Nazis marylandblue Nov 2017 #134
But that is a "logical leap" that requires facts in evidence. guillaumeb Nov 2017 #135
I don't need facts in evidence if I can define my own terms EOM marylandblue Nov 2017 #136
True, but the debate arises when one applies those self-defined terms guillaumeb Nov 2017 #137
No there is no debate marylandblue Nov 2017 #141
Facts in evidence: Lordquinton Nov 2017 #152
And if you have no facts, is it permissible to construct them? guillaumeb Nov 2017 #162
I can make my own personal definition of facts and construction marylandblue Nov 2017 #163
This thread destroyed that claim Lordquinton Nov 2017 #164
I think I see what you mean. sprinkleeninow Nov 2017 #140
Yup. marylandblue Nov 2017 #142
Thing is, a poster says something and they get jumped on, pulled apart and sprinkleeninow Nov 2017 #145
A lot of people on this site are New Atheists marylandblue Nov 2017 #149
Okay. I see how some who have embraced atheism more recently than not sprinkleeninow Nov 2017 #153
Some posters get "jumped on" a lot more than others. Mariana Nov 2017 #160
And if a member accuses another of one thing, guillaumeb Nov 2017 #165
... Mariana Nov 2017 #166
You ignored my response, and my questions. guillaumeb Nov 2017 #170
Okay, those offenses would be a bummer. sprinkleeninow Nov 2017 #167
Would I be thrilled to see one come into the fold? Mariana Nov 2017 #144
You be thrilled for your fold and I be happy happy joy for mine. sprinkleeninow Nov 2017 #146
I was quoting you. Sorry I didn't use the correct punctuation. Mariana Nov 2017 #147
Can we pick this up l8r? Gotta cook supper for dogga and dogga's pop. sprinkleeninow Nov 2017 #148
Sure, take your time. nt. Mariana Nov 2017 #150
Not as young as I used to be. In body, not mind/spirit. sprinkleeninow Nov 2017 #154
You said, Mariana Nov 2017 #156
The Church. The Church Community of Communicants. sprinkleeninow Nov 2017 #157
That's not to say you may also have a 'fold' wherein sprinkleeninow Nov 2017 #158
Interestingly enough, I wonder the same thing at times when you post. guillaumeb Nov 2017 #129
I think I'm pretty straightforward with my style. Cuthbert Allgood Nov 2017 #159
Did y'all call me homely? sprinkleeninow Nov 2017 #169
A nice response. guillaumeb Nov 2017 #171
At times, I do speaketh truth. 😉 😇/😈 sprinkleeninow Nov 2017 #172
If you grew up stateside, way back if someone said, "I resemble that!", it was a play on words, sprinkleeninow Nov 2017 #173
I actually did not. guillaumeb Nov 2017 #174
There's just something about you I do sense and like. sprinkleeninow Nov 2017 #175
And peace to you and yours. guillaumeb Nov 2017 #176
Appreciative. Yes, peace be 'to all' who seek, ask, and respond concerning sprinkleeninow Nov 2017 #177
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Good news: 'This movement...»Reply #73