Religion

MineralMan

(146,338 posts)

35. ...

Reply to guillaumeb (Reply #33)

Wed Jan 3, 2018, 01:39 PM

Jan 2018

Only one reply to you in a subthread from now on, Guillaume. That's it.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

72 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Evangelicals surprising view of science and what it may mean [View all] guillaumeb Jan 2018 OP

I don't know any religious people in real life that hates science. PragmaticDem Jan 2018 #1

I do not either. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #3

Guillaumeb has given us another straw man, I'm afraid. trotsky Jan 2018 #6

The actual straw man is in your rely #4. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #8

This is a bit more nuanced than what is insisted by many to be true. yallerdawg Jan 2018 #2

Perhaps some suffer from an allergy to nuance. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #5

No, they don't generally hate science. trotsky Jan 2018 #4

Possibly you read a different article? guillaumeb Jan 2018 #7

Nope. trotsky Jan 2018 #20

I think if you look closely Igel Jan 2018 #46

Could very well be. trotsky Jan 2018 #47

and fossils were planted to test Christian's faith. AJT Jan 2018 #51

Absolutely! n/t trotsky Jan 2018 #53

Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2018 #9

Welcome to DU, and this discussion. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #11

Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2018 #14

The Franken threads are a bit heated at this point. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #17

Obfuscation.. Permanut Jan 2018 #10

If Ken Ham did not exist, guillaumeb Jan 2018 #12

But he DOES exist. trotsky Jan 2018 #23

Not really. He has plenty of clones. nt. Mariana Jan 2018 #44

Great news about American evangelicals... ExciteBike66 Jan 2018 #13

A bit hyperbolic. eom guillaumeb Jan 2018 #15

Never heard of ISIS, huh? ExciteBike66 Jan 2018 #16

Have you ever heard of the over 1 billion Muslims who are not ISIS members? guillaumeb Jan 2018 #18

But you understand that a study about the scientific acceptance of American evangelicals ExciteBike66 Jan 2018 #22

Deflection.. Permanut Jan 2018 #26

Lot of hypocrisy here in addition to faulty premises Bradshaw3 Jan 2018 #19

A miracle is another word for an unexplained phenomenon. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #24

No it's not Bradshaw3 Jan 2018 #28

I gave a definition for miracle. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #31

Yes, and you're correct. Igel Jan 2018 #48

So your claim to being a victim of broad brush painting is rendered invalid Bradshaw3 Jan 2018 #54

I would be interested to see how many American evangelicals subscribe to NOMA... ExciteBike66 Jan 2018 #34

I have no idea. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #38

My guess is that more non-theists agree with NOMA ExciteBike66 Jan 2018 #41

I think it would be a pointless survey. Igel Jan 2018 #49

That is not the way those evangelicals are using the word. Mariana Jan 2018 #63

An excellent response to guillaumeb. trotsky Jan 2018 #27

For somebody who wants to be the tone police in this group, you sure come out swinging. Cuthbert Allgood Jan 2018 #21

Did this article challenge your thinking? guillaumeb Jan 2018 #25

You really try hard to avoid the actual point. Why do you come out swinging? Cuthbert Allgood Jan 2018 #37

Define the lecture, and what you see as my point. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #39

"a more nuanced view of this topic might conflict with the way some prefer to dismiss theists" Cuthbert Allgood Jan 2018 #42

Numerous posts here have attempted to define Christians, guillaumeb Jan 2018 #52

Stay on topic. Why do you want others to have a better tone but you don't do it yourself? Cuthbert Allgood Jan 2018 #55

I see nothing wrong with my tone. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #57

Then stop telling others to change their tone. Cuthbert Allgood Jan 2018 #58

An interesting attempt at blaming others. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #59

An interesting attempt at avoiding your own culpability Cuthbert Allgood Jan 2018 #60

"Numerous posts here have attempted to define Christians, and what Christians must believe." trotsky Jan 2018 #62

The evidence is abundant, if one wishes to see it. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #64

LINK TO THE POSTS THAT PROVE YOUR CLAIM. trotsky Jan 2018 #65

I have read many claims from non-theists. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #66

LINK TO THE POSTS THAT PROVE YOUR CLAIM. trotsky Jan 2018 #67

Strong charges. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #68

LINK TO THE POSTS THAT PROVE YOUR CLAIM. n/t trotsky Jan 2018 #69

LINK TO THE POSTS THAT PROVE YOUR CLAIM. n/t trotsky Jan 2018 #70

LINK TO THE POSTS THAT PROVE YOUR CLAIM. n/t trotsky Jan 2018 #72

And yet, Ken Ham: MineralMan Jan 2018 #29

Perhaps you are unconvinced. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #33

... MineralMan Jan 2018 #35

Here's the problem: influential Evangelicals are hostile to any science that threatens their views. Girard442 Jan 2018 #30

Evangelicals are like gay muslims thbobby Jan 2018 #32

True. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #36

Not surprising Cuthbert Allgood Jan 2018 #40

This does not tell us what Evangelicals think of science. Act_of_Reparation Jan 2018 #43

The religious people who hate science Cartoonist Jan 2018 #45

I am not defending any view point. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #56

I don't know how they define "evangelical." Igel Jan 2018 #50

They probably ask the respondents, "Are you an evangelical?" Mariana Jan 2018 #71

Not buying it. RelativelyJones Jan 2018 #61