Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: When it comes to religious belief, or lack of, name calling is not dialogue. [View all]Mariana
(14,857 posts)47. Yes, everyone knows the kind of dialog you want to see in this group.
You want to have conversations like this:
OP: "The human mind is a pale reflection of the Creator..."
Good: "You're absolutely right!"
Good: "That's so profound!"
Good: "Praise the Lord!"
These kind of exchanges are unacceptable:
OP: "The human mind is a pale reflection of the Creator..."
Bad: "Please describe this creator."
Bad: "Whose human mind?"
Bad: "How do you know this?"
There are several groups on DU that were set up specifically so religious people can have the first kind of conversation, and avoid the second type altogether. This one lone group permits the second kind, and you don't seem to like that one little bit.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
102 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
When it comes to religious belief, or lack of, name calling is not dialogue. [View all]
guillaumeb
Nov 2018
OP
I agree. I've come to understand that if I call an evangelical Christian a "Fundie,"
Still In Wisconsin
Nov 2018
#1
If you're going to accuse me of ad hominem, you should have the integrity to explain yourself
Major Nikon
Nov 2018
#19
Moving the goal posts is a common tactic of those uninterested in civil discourse
Major Nikon
Nov 2018
#85