Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Is the religious left too nice and without influence? [View all]Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)65. I think you're pretty close the mark there
The issue, I think, is that the religious left is more in keeping with mainstream liberals, and America in general. The religious right is so off the reservation virtually everything they say is controversial, and therefore "newsworthy".
It seems prudent to point out most liberals as themselves believers. This makes the "religious left" a difficult demographic to nail down. Because liberals ostensibly value secularism, not all of them evoke the name of God at every opportunity, but that does not mean they don't correlate their religious and political beliefs.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
97 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
But accusing some DUers of carrying water for the right is still a serious accusation
muriel_volestrangler
Feb 2013
#8
I brought it up because I know the Scientologists aren't part of your brand. You're atheist toward
dimbear
Feb 2013
#54
I see the ground rules emerging now. In 1601 in Lisbon, the Catholic church represented by
dimbear
Feb 2013
#59
And there are many here whose only purpose seems to be to attack religion and religionist.
cbayer
Feb 2013
#18
Which is carrying water: opposing the right's attempt to redefine the start of pregnancy
muriel_volestrangler
Feb 2013
#16
A discussion about the start of pregnancy is not what I am talking about at all.
cbayer
Feb 2013
#19
It's not my wishful thinking at all. They voiced support (maybe strongly is the wrong word)
cbayer
Feb 2013
#27
You and I disagreeing on a policy point is not the same thing as the members here who
cbayer
Feb 2013
#43
By supporting Obama's administration "compromise" you (generic and personal) are enabling religious
idwiyo
Feb 2013
#95
I disagree with you. I think a compromise is in order and I think this one is reasonable.
cbayer
Feb 2013
#96
If any one regularly carries water for the religious right, it's the religious left.
Evoman
Feb 2013
#12
But there is no objective way in which to justify one's interpretation
Act_of_Reparation
Feb 2013
#68
I have nothing more to say to you, but you are about to experience a significant
cbayer
Feb 2013
#89
Conundrum. The religious right has essentially become a political organization / movement.
pinto
Feb 2013
#31
Good points. I'd love to see a broad, vocal coalition re-emerge around common causes and objectives.
pinto
Feb 2013
#40
The Left...which includes some religious denominations..in my experience is characterized by thought
libdem4life
Feb 2013
#38
Thanks. In some groups, it's called Holding the Space. That's where I generally find myself.
libdem4life
Feb 2013
#46
What a gift...the web sites and as a pianist, the You Tube karaoke. Many, many blessings to you.
libdem4life
Feb 2013
#51
Yes, they are. They are Universal archetypes like the Creation and the Flood
libdem4life
Feb 2013
#66
I got hooked on this somewhere between my 60s Soc-Anthro BA and fleeing my childhood Right Wingers.
libdem4life
Feb 2013
#71