HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Science » Science (Group) » A Minor Problem For Sound... » Reply #30

Response to hunter (Reply #29)

Sat Oct 7, 2017, 09:48 PM

30. Natural gas is successful without solar and wind.

Here are the two scenarios.
1. More gas plants with solar and wind.
2. more gas plants.
If each equal 100.
Then 1. is what, 70% more gas and 2. is 100% gas with each new plant opened.
You choose. You can say whatever you want to say, we should do this or that, but this is what is happening. Right now we are buying time. Solar and wind gives us that time. Without it we have less time. Hopefully it gives us the time to figure this out, because we have to. I just want to add, for some reason countries are growing in solar and wind at a large percentage, and they are not with Nuclear. I am sure it is because of the large scale demonstrations against nuclear across the world. Could it be because it economically doesn't make sense compared to renewable energy and gas energy? I mean, we know that energy companies are real sensitive to the prevailing thought and don't follow the money. As I have stated before, I havenothing against Nuclear energy, I just don't think that it is necessarily better than solar and wind. Both have their pro's and con's. I am in the camp of lets do what is best for humanity but to ignore Nuclear problems while bashing solar and wind is the height of ignorance.

I lied, I just want to add one more thing, you put this in your post "It's apparent gas is a desirable energy source for many people, even anti-nuclear activists," and I am really tired of you insinuating that is what I believe. I am really tired of you putting words in my mouth. I just want any jury to read this entire thread before you judge what I am about to say, Hunter, you are a despicable excuse for a human. You continue to ascribe things that I have never said to me, insinuate that I am anti-nuclear, pro-gas when all I have done is argue the benefits of solar and wind while accepting the problems those pose while pointing out the problems Nuclear poses are at least equal, You use republican talking points against renewable energy and are generally just a fucking twat. You cant even answer a simple yes or no question because you know it will show your hypocrisy. If I didn't know any better I would think you were a PR person for the Nuclear industry. If you aren't, you should be, you would fit in perfectly.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 38 replies Author Time Post
NNadir Sep 2017 OP
Eko Sep 2017 #1
hunter Sep 2017 #2
NNadir Sep 2017 #3
Eko Sep 2017 #4
hunter Sep 2017 #6
Eko Oct 2017 #11
NNadir Sep 2017 #5
Eko Sep 2017 #7
Eko Sep 2017 #8
hunter Oct 2017 #10
Eko Oct 2017 #12
hunter Oct 2017 #13
Eko Oct 2017 #14
hunter Oct 2017 #16
Eko Oct 2017 #19
hunter Oct 2017 #20
Eko Oct 2017 #23
Eko Oct 2017 #15
hunter Oct 2017 #17
Eko Oct 2017 #18
hunter Oct 2017 #21
Eko Oct 2017 #22
hunter Oct 2017 #24
Eko Oct 2017 #25
Eko Oct 2017 #26
hunter Oct 2017 #27
Eko Oct 2017 #28
hunter Oct 2017 #29
LineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineNew Reply Natural gas is successful without solar and wind.
Eko Oct 2017 #30
hunter Oct 2017 #31
Eko Oct 2017 #32
hunter Oct 2017 #33
Eko Oct 2017 #34
hunter Oct 2017 #35
Eko Oct 2017 #36
hunter Oct 2017 #37
Eko Oct 2017 #38
Eko Sep 2017 #9
Please login to view edit histories.