Friendly forums for passionate Dems!
More than 91 million posts since 2001
Home Latest Greatest Videos Forums Hide ads Join up!
Home Latest Greatest
Videos Forums Help
Hide ads Join up!
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Doublethink in science. ...»Reply #2
Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Science

In reply to the discussion: Doublethink in science. Coal is a renewable resource? [View all]

NNadir

(33,518 posts)
2. Thousands of centuries, actually, although this said, the Boudouard Reaction makes something...
Reply to SCantiGOP (Reply #1)
Sat Jun 1, 2019, 12:07 PM
Jun 2019

...very much like "synthetic coal" possible, something which might be explored for use in certain materials engineering processes.

TopBack to the top of the page AlertAlert this post for a rule violation ShareGet links to this post PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
  EditCannot edit other people's posts RecommendRecommend this post ReplyReply to this post

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Doublethink in science. Coal is a renewable resource? [View all] NNadir Jun 2019 OP
It is renewable SCantiGOP Jun 2019 #1
Thousands of centuries, actually, although this said, the Boudouard Reaction makes something... NNadir Jun 2019 #2
Wait a sec... HuskyOffset Jun 2019 #3
Yes. That is precisely what I'm saying. NNadir Jun 2019 #4
"roughly 35 billion tons of CO2 per year" angstlessk Jun 2019 #6
Seriously? HuskyOffset Jun 2019 #7
Look, there's lots of evidence for the uselessness of the wind industry. NNadir Jun 2019 #8
I noticed HuskyOffset Jun 2019 #9
In general, what one can derive from text, whether written or verbal, derives from... NNadir Jun 2019 #13
Wow, now that is a proper burn! HuskyOffset Jun 2019 #19
Here's what FactCheck says about the life-cycle carbon footprint of wind energy. Jim__ Jun 2019 #10
That chart neglects the commitment to natural gas each kilowatt of wind or solar power represents. hunter Jun 2019 #12
The obverse of your claim is that every kilowatt of electricity generated by wind power ... Jim__ Jun 2019 #15
It's feel good nonsense. Like a smoker cutting down from a pack-a-day habit... hunter Jun 2019 #16
Wrong analogy. It's much more like breathing polluted air. Every breath is bad for you. Jim__ Jun 2019 #17
Zing. Yet another wind power supporter conflates air pollution and climate change. hunter Jun 2019 #18
I no more conflated climate change with air pollution than you conflated it with smoking cigarettes. Jim__ Jun 2019 #20
No it's not. People insist on viewing wind turbines as progress... hunter Jun 2019 #21
And shadowmayor Jun 2019 #5
Nnadir, you are grinding that axe just a little too hard. Nitram Jun 2019 #11
I'm sorry, but I don't think I'm grinding it hard enough. NNadir Jun 2019 #14
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Doublethink in science. ...»Reply #2
Home | Latest Discussions | Greatest Discussions | Latest Videos | All Forums

About | Copyright | Privacy | Terms of service | Contact

In Memoriam

© 2001 - 2024 Democratic Underground, LLC. Thank you for visiting.