Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Aren't AA Dems slightly sickened by Hillary's "cleaving" to Obama tonight, after 2008? [View all]Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)108. That's great dialouge! What would you sound like without all that diplomatic skill?
zero knowledge and babbling, and that's diplomatic?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
222 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Aren't AA Dems slightly sickened by Hillary's "cleaving" to Obama tonight, after 2008? [View all]
grasswire
Jan 2016
OP
No. And David Axelrod really should not comment about Hillary campaign (nt)
question everything
Jan 2016
#1
Out in the open pandering. I don't believe the polls that say the black vote is for hillary.
onecaliberal
Jan 2016
#5
Nothing's free anymore, didn't anyone tell you? Proof is required after a week of lies.
DisgustipatedinCA
Jan 2016
#122
The commenter has been provided with the fact multiple times. He doesn't care.
Luminous Animal
Jan 2016
#69
Yes, and after her disastrous term ended, he graciously accepted her resignation
leveymg
Jan 2016
#19
The Clinton campaign no longer gets to talk in terms of "fact". They've told too many lies.
DisgustipatedinCA
Jan 2016
#94
That's great dialouge! What would you sound like without all that diplomatic skill?
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2016
#108
Regime changes in Libya, Syria, and the establishment and spread of IS. But, you wouldn't know
leveymg
Jan 2016
#187
Iraq was Bush's contribution. Libya and Syria are Clinton and Petraeus projects
leveymg
Jan 2016
#206
New Poll Shows ‘Surging’ Sanders Losing Ground With the Voter Group He Needs Most
Gothmog
Jan 2016
#222
New Poll Shows ‘Surging’ Sanders Losing Ground With the Voter Group He Needs Most
Gothmog
Jan 2016
#221
What are Sanders' polling numbers in South Carolina and other non-white states?
Gothmog
Jan 2016
#181
remember in 2008 when hillary invoked the assassination of Robert Kennedy
nashville_brook
Jan 2016
#17
what's offensive is those who trashed Obama for years suddenly now faking Concern over 2008
JI7
Jan 2016
#18
Yeah, right? Reading what many here wrote about Barack in 2007-2008 archives has been very instructive.
Green Forest
Jan 2016
#26
PUMAS were banned. many of those accused of being PUMAS right now actually supported Obama in 2008
JI7
Jan 2016
#35
There may have been an effort but it was not totally successful, according to my archive reading.
Green Forest
Jan 2016
#97
What concern? I have no concern over 2008, but I'll damn sure point out her lies.
DisgustipatedinCA
Jan 2016
#104
That was the deal they reached that night in her DC house before the Convention
leveymg
Jan 2016
#41
You link doesn't back up anything you said... So again I say apparently we are just making shit up.
Agschmid
Jan 2016
#156
Do you have something better that sheds light on how and why Obama appointed her as SOS?
leveymg
Jan 2016
#158
That terminology is not so great. In any place with actual 'heirs' to power that is a birth right
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2016
#109
Because it would be a stupid idea for a sitting President to endorse someone in a ...
1StrongBlackMan
Jan 2016
#150
For the same reasons that no other sitting presidents have endorsed in the primary
Empowerer
Jan 2016
#152
What I meant is that of the two front runners, obviously Hillary is the one politically closest
Beacool
Jan 2016
#172
Aren't AA Dems slightly sickened by Bernie's suggesting Obama be primaried?
brooklynite
Jan 2016
#32
Not slightly, at this point very and it was smart of Clinton to start this conversation in SC
uponit7771
Jan 2016
#142
Sanders campaigns against Obama. Clinton is extending what Obama started. Figure it out. Not tough
seabeyond
Jan 2016
#43
I know. It is a hoot his supporters that ignore what the man says. One would think, that his
seabeyond
Jan 2016
#51
In other words, you completely skipped the question put to you because he wasn't disrespectful.
DisgustipatedinCA
Jan 2016
#95
He says "...Obama has been able to move to the right..." then suggest a a remedy of primary so he
uponit7771
Jan 2016
#144
Yep they campaigned in the GE for him but first they were the two Americans most dedicated to
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2016
#110
I think we're sicker of being patronized by people who treat us as if we can't think for ourselves
Empowerer
Jan 2016
#112
It is in HRC's self interest to cling to President Obama. We are all adults!!! We know that!!!
DemocratSinceBirth
Jan 2016
#170
Her trying to take credit for Obama's success in Iran was her worst moment of the night.
EndElectoral
Jan 2016
#139
We needed another one of these posts after the other successful paternalistic thread. nt
LexVegas
Jan 2016
#157
Aren't Bernie supporters slightly sickened by the constant display of brow-beating paternalism ...
1StrongBlackMan
Jan 2016
#173
I haven't forgotten 2008. Hillary doesn't believe in anything and Sanders is promising things he can
craigmatic
Jan 2016
#214
"I adore wrapping myself in Obama." Tonight. Cleave to Obama. Obama, the fragrance.
betsuni
Jan 2016
#215