Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Bill USA

(6,436 posts)
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 06:37 PM Jan 2016

NYT: Hillary Clinton, 1 of most broadly & deeply qualified presidential candidates in modern history [View all]

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/31/opinion/sunday/hillary-clinton-endorsement.html

For the past painful year, the Republican presidential contenders have been bombarding Americans with empty propaganda slogans and competing, bizarrely, to present themselves as the least experienced person for the most important elected job in the world. Democratic primary voters, on the other hand, after a substantive debate over real issues, have the chance to nominate one of the most broadly and deeply qualified presidential candidates in modern history.

Hillary Clinton would be the first woman nominated by a major party. She served as a senator from a major state (New York) and as secretary of state — not to mention her experience on the national stage as first lady with her brilliant and flawed husband, President Bill Clinton. The Times editorial board has endorsed her three times for federal office — twice for Senate and once in the 2008 Democratic presidential primary — and is doing so again with confidence and enthusiasm.

Mrs. Clinton’s main opponent, Senator Bernie Sanders, a self-described Democratic Socialist, has proved to be more formidable than most people, including Mrs. Clinton, anticipated. He has brought income inequality and the lingering pain of the middle class to center stage and pushed Mrs. Clinton a bit more to the left than she might have gone on economic issues. Mr. Sanders has also surfaced important foreign policy questions, including the need for greater restraint in the use of military force.

In the end, though, Mr. Sanders does not have the breadth of experience or policy ideas that Mrs. Clinton offers. His boldest proposals — to break up the banks and to start all over on health care reform with a Medicare-for-all system — have earned him support among alienated middle-class voters and young people. But his plans for achieving them aren’t realistic, while Mrs. Clinton has very good, and achievable, proposals in both areas.

~~
~~

Hillary Clinton is the right choice for the Democrats to present a vision for America that is radically different from the one that leading Republican candidates offer — a vision in which middle-class Americans have a real shot at prosperity, women’s rights are enhanced, undocumented immigrants are given a chance at legitimacy, international alliances are nurtured and the country is kept safe.
(more)


NYT endorses Clinton. Now comes the scorn from GOPers and Bernie Sanders supporters!!

41 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Not as qualified as James Buchanan, our top President. *snicker* jfern Jan 2016 #1
Or even George H.W.Bush, the "most qualified" candidate of the 20th century Art_from_Ark Jan 2016 #38
NYT: Saddam Hussein has weapons of mass destruction and needs to be taken down nichomachus Jan 2016 #2
+1000 nt Logical Jan 2016 #15
Miller. Iraq. Nuff said. Punkingal Jan 2016 #3
Uhhhh, No. Sound judgement is a fundamental, absolutely required qualification kristopher Jan 2016 #4
But I learned on DU that the Times is anti-Hillary. bunnies Jan 2016 #5
You did? murielm99 Jan 2016 #13
this is the reason we're separated. bunnies Jan 2016 #19
*snort* frylock Jan 2016 #35
The whole thing is great. arely staircase Jan 2016 #6
Experience in nice, but the ability to learn from experience is even better. guillaumeb Jan 2016 #7
Like the health care plan in Vermont that failed? murielm99 Jan 2016 #16
Clean up on aisle 4 frylock Jan 2016 #36
"Broad-ly" qualiflied? That's sexist! rocktivity Jan 2016 #8
Qualifications SamKnause Jan 2016 #9
What a load of crap. pangaia Jan 2016 #10
More like one of the "most broadly & deeply flawed" candidates in modern history. EndElectoral Jan 2016 #11
Certainly the most highly groomed presidential candidate in modern history.. frylock Jan 2016 #12
Investment Firms Agree also. nt Logical Jan 2016 #14
Yes she is. DCBob Jan 2016 #17
The Newspaper of War earthside Jan 2016 #18
Deeply flawed. I fixed it for the writer of this piece. JRLeft Jan 2016 #20
K and R for Hillary's "very good, and ACHIEVABLE proposals". oasis Jan 2016 #21
That's one of the main take-aways right there! NurseJackie Jan 2016 #22
Yup, pie- in-the-sky just won't cut it. (eom) oasis Jan 2016 #24
Doing ANYTHING outside of the GOP Box is pie in the sky to you people Armstead Jan 2016 #25
You may trash Obama's accomplishments as "do nothing" redstateblues Jan 2016 #31
I'm not trashing Brown. He's a great Senator. Obama has been a good President. Armstead Jan 2016 #33
Not moved the needle? redstateblues Jan 2016 #37
I would have rather seen your daughter and millions of others have more options Armstead Jan 2016 #39
I'm not trashing any ideals redstateblues Jan 2016 #41
The Clinton System cali Jan 2016 #23
That Iraq War vote gets me every time. democrank Jan 2016 #26
Me too! NowSam Jan 2016 #29
If you love the status quo she is perfect. NowSam Jan 2016 #27
She will not withstand the republican attacks as she has too many problems Rosa Luxemburg Jan 2016 #28
NYT: erratum. Hillary Clinton one of the most deeply disqualified candidates in recent American leveymg Jan 2016 #30
LOL; Mr. Slim, One of World's Richest Billionaires Now Basically Owns the NY Times; NY Times represe amborin Jan 2016 #32
she is our champion juxtaposed Jan 2016 #34
DU rec...nt SidDithers Jan 2016 #40
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»NYT: Hillary Clinton, 1 o...»Reply #0