Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Sneering at "free stuff" is a vicious Repuke attack on the very idea of public goods. [View all]KansDem
(28,498 posts)25. Free stuff for corporations
More Free Stuff for Corporations
--excerpt--
This rich guy, Peter Georgescu, chairman emeritus of the PR firm Young & Rubicam, said in a New York Times op-ed in August that he feared the current grotesque level of income inequality would provoke major social unrest or oppressive tax levies on the rich unless the rich did something about it right away. To avert restoration of the higher income tax levels that the rich paid from 1935 to 1985, Georgescu recommended that the federal government give money to businesses to raise the wages of workers earning less than $80,000 a year.
Thats right. He says the government should subsidize corporations. The government should give them free stuff. Welfare. The government, in his estimation, should pay corporations rather than simply requiring them to use some of their massive profits, now at the highest level in 85 years, to adequately compensate the workers whose labor created those profits.
Making the government pay is a popular position among Georgescus wealthy peers and GOP politicians. They dont want the government to protect the environment or negotiate for lower pharmaceutical prices for senior citizens on Medicare or provide 16 million Americans with insurance through the Affordable Care Act. They do want the government to hand money to corporations, though.
Just weeks ago, Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, a candidate for the Republican nomination for president, announced hed use this corporate freebie scheme to provide paid sick and maternity leave. The United States is the only major industrial country in the world without a federal policy requiring paid sick and maternity leave. Rubio called the absence of paid leave one of the greatest threats to family today.
Even so, he wouldnt actually require corporations to provide it.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/leo-w-gerard/more-free-stuff-for-corpo_b_8240520.html
--excerpt--
This rich guy, Peter Georgescu, chairman emeritus of the PR firm Young & Rubicam, said in a New York Times op-ed in August that he feared the current grotesque level of income inequality would provoke major social unrest or oppressive tax levies on the rich unless the rich did something about it right away. To avert restoration of the higher income tax levels that the rich paid from 1935 to 1985, Georgescu recommended that the federal government give money to businesses to raise the wages of workers earning less than $80,000 a year.
Thats right. He says the government should subsidize corporations. The government should give them free stuff. Welfare. The government, in his estimation, should pay corporations rather than simply requiring them to use some of their massive profits, now at the highest level in 85 years, to adequately compensate the workers whose labor created those profits.
Making the government pay is a popular position among Georgescus wealthy peers and GOP politicians. They dont want the government to protect the environment or negotiate for lower pharmaceutical prices for senior citizens on Medicare or provide 16 million Americans with insurance through the Affordable Care Act. They do want the government to hand money to corporations, though.
Just weeks ago, Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, a candidate for the Republican nomination for president, announced hed use this corporate freebie scheme to provide paid sick and maternity leave. The United States is the only major industrial country in the world without a federal policy requiring paid sick and maternity leave. Rubio called the absence of paid leave one of the greatest threats to family today.
Even so, he wouldnt actually require corporations to provide it.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/leo-w-gerard/more-free-stuff-for-corpo_b_8240520.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Sneering at "free stuff" is a vicious Repuke attack on the very idea of public goods. [View all]
eridani
Feb 2016
OP
Bernie's campaign was not ever about free stuff, but always about corruption. Those sneering at
Jefferson23
Feb 2016
#1
I hear you, he talks primarily about what blocks our efforts. A constant uphill battle
Jefferson23
Feb 2016
#42
It's weird that it's "free stuff" when the money goes to the general public
winter is coming
Feb 2016
#4
If your house catches fire, a capitalist wouldn't care, if it ignites his, he does.
HereSince1628
Feb 2016
#7
IMO wherever market incentives don't work private enterprise/free markets shouldn't
HereSince1628
Feb 2016
#34
I had a conservative tell me today that taxes pay for roads and schools and that is not
AllyCat
Feb 2016
#8
The folks with jobs pay taxes to educate kids that will become folks with jobs
bigbrother05
Feb 2016
#13
We don't teach civics in school anymore so the concept of The Commons is being lost.
CrispyQ
Feb 2016
#18
It makes me loathe Clinton even more than I already did that she inspires
CharlotteVale
Feb 2016
#22
It's interesting how they understand the "spread the risk" and "spread the benefit" concepts
TBF
Feb 2016
#23
It isn't just the GOPers. It's some of the Clinton supporters, too, right here
The Velveteen Ocelot
Feb 2016
#26
And the trillions we've spent slaughtering and maiming tens and tens of thousands of Iraqis?
Arugula Latte
Feb 2016
#31
Thank you. The contempt some here have toward educating our young people is appalling.
myrna minx
Feb 2016
#40