Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Showing Original Post only (View all)Clinton Promises 'Absolutely, Absolutely' Nothing to Worry About in Wall Street Speeches [View all]
Clinton Promises 'Absolutely, Absolutely' Nothing to Worry About in Wall Street SpeechesNew York Times editorial joins those urging Democratic presidential candidate to release transcripts of controversial speeches
by Jon Queally, staff writer
http://www.commondreams.org/news/2016/02/26/clinton-promises-absolutely-absolutely-nothing-worry-about-wall-street-speeches
Hillary Clinton has now said voters have no reason to worry about what's in the paid speeches she gave to Goldman Sachs and other Wall Street firms. (Photo: AP)
From the New York Times editorial board to a Republican-friendly super PAC, it appears unease is widespread over Hillary Clinton's continued refusal to release transcripts of recent paid speeches she gave to some of Wall Street's most powerful firms.
In a sharply-worded editorial in Friday's print edition, the Times described Clinton's excuses for not releasing the transcripts as those of a "mischievous child, not a presidential candidate"arguing that "public interest in these speeches is legitimate" and that by "stonewalling" their release "Mrs. Clinton plays into the hands of those who say shes not trustworthy and makes her own rules."
However, in an interview with MSNBC's Mika Brzezinski and Joe Scarborough that aired Friday morning, Clinton again defended her relationship with Wall Street and said the voting public has no need to worry about what she may have said in the speeches that earned her millions of dollars.
Full story:
From the New York Times editorial board to a Republican-friendly super PAC, it appears unease is widespread over Hillary Clinton's continued refusal to release transcripts of recent paid speeches she gave to some of Wall Street's most powerful firms.
In a sharply-worded editorial in Friday's print edition, the Times described Clinton's excuses for not releasing the transcripts as those of a "mischievous child, not a presidential candidate"arguing that "public interest in these speeches is legitimate" and that by "stonewalling" their release "Mrs. Clinton plays into the hands of those who say shes not trustworthy and makes her own rules."
However, in an interview with MSNBC's Mika Brzezinski and Joe Scarborough that aired Friday morning, Clinton again defended her relationship with Wall Street and said the voting public has no need to worry about what she may have said in the speeches that earned her millions of dollars.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
34 replies, 4725 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (34)
ReplyReply to this post
34 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Clinton Promises 'Absolutely, Absolutely' Nothing to Worry About in Wall Street Speeches [View all]
newthinking
Feb 2016
OP
I see it a little differently. Her fans already know she works for Goldman-Sachs and Wall Street
rhett o rick
Feb 2016
#6
She can't turn them over because they are being audited? No ... wait ... that's Trump's tax returns
Attorney in Texas
Feb 2016
#4
What she means by "nothing to worry about" is "Don't worry about the things I said because I did not
thereismore
Feb 2016
#9
HRC:"You're asking me to say I have never, I don't believe I ever have. I don't believe I ever will"
nc4bo
Feb 2016
#14
If they're all that benign and flawless maybe she should demand more of a payoff for her next gig.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Feb 2016
#32
I told my wife there was 'Absolutely, Absolutely' Nothing to Worry About
SoLeftIAmRight
Feb 2016
#34