2016 Postmortem
Showing Original Post only (View all)Campaigns vs Movements [View all]
One of the most interesting phenomenon of the Democratic Partys 2016 presidential primary contest is the tension between the manner that supporters of Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton view the process. I say this, not in an attempt to present it as right vs. wrong, as the differences are ones of opinion, after evaluating the same basic materials.
As a Bernie supporter, who will vote for the partys nominee, I understand that -- for example -- I view the Clinton campaigns refusal to release the transcripts from her talks to Goldman Sachs much differently than do my friends who support Hillary. We look at the same general set of facts, and come to very different conclusions.
And thats okay. There is no good reason for the growing hostilities that exist between the supporters of each candidate. There are very real differences between Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton. Those differences include what each one would seek to if elected. More, these differences will determine the outcome of the presidential election in November.
In my opinion, the biggest difference between the two candidates supporters is this: there is a Clinton campaign versus a Sanders movement. Just my opinion, nothing more. I suspect that more of the DU community that supports Bernie would agree, though, than those supporting Hillary.
One reality that both camps share is that no person, no matter how intelligent and insightful, can properly judge the historic significance -- and ultimate value -- of a movement, while it is happening. That is distinct from a campaign: we know the results of elections shortly after they are held -- unless the machine decides to interfere, as in 2000. But, even then, we knew within a short time who won, and that the US Supreme Court was overturning the outcome.
Both campaigns and movements can represent what is good in our political life. There comes times when each are appropriate. And, at their peak of potential, each can coordinate with the other. But even then, the true impact of a movement will be impossible to fully judge at the time. Specific gains can be measured, but the sum total cannot. Lets look at few relatively recent movements, and take an objective view of their worth.
In the lifetime of the baby-boomer generation, we have seen the civil rights movement; the anti-war movement; the womens movement; rights for the disabled movement; gay and lesbian rights movement; the anti-nuke movement; the environmental movement; and, most recently, the Occupy movement. Although these may appear diverse, they all share a common goal: to expand social justice, by recognizing the human rights of people who were marginalized by society. More, while they provide safety and protections for human beings, they did not infringe upon the rights of others in any manner whatsoever.
They have more in common, my friends. In virtually every case, they faced the opposition of an entrenched group, who were intent upon denying others their human rights. More, they had to deal with an even larger group of people who may have been sympathetic to their cause, in theory, but who were convinced that now is not the time. Friends who believed the activists wanted too much progress, too soon. The best example of this can be found in the clergy who, from the comfort and luxury of their homes, told Martin Luther King that they were with him as he sat in the dark in dreary cell in the Birmingham jail, but that he needed to slow down. To be patient.
I suppose is it easier to be patient, when you are comfortable. And so it would make sense to support a campaign that promises to extend your comfort level, especially in uncomfortable times. Yet, for those who are denied those comforts, it would seem self-defeating to merely campaign. And when the numbers of those that society pushes outside the margins becomes, as it is today, a majority, a campaign is not as attractive as a movement.
The Occupy movement showed the beauty and power of this. It highlighted the insanity of allowing the 1% to exercise majority rule in this country. Occupy put into effect a simple truth of movements: if you want people to behave differently, you must first help them to think differently. And thats the proper place for patience. But, on the flip side, with that patience must come creative tension.
The Sanders movement (aka Sanders revolution) was, at first, incorrectly perceived as a pipe dream by the Democratic Partys establishment. Surprise, surprise! As Bernie stated, Do not underestimate me. Yet the establishment, including those organizing the Clinton campaign, absolutely underestimated Bernie Sanders, because they viewed his challenge as coming from an intelligent, sincere man who has inhabited the margin of the US Senate. The Clinton campaign had not hired a weatherman to tell them which way the winds blow.
One example of this, in my opinion, can be found in the actions of an honorable man, Rep. John Lewis. I consider him a hero. He was a powerful member of the civil rights movement, who used advances in voting rights, to become a voice of conscience in Washington, DC. He was -- and is -- the type of human being that we want in government. For we want decent, honorable people inside of the governments establishment.
Yet, some of the tactics he used in initially endorsing Hillary were wrong. That doesnt mean he is less than a hero. It means, rather, that years within the establishment can influence most peoples values. Like many other good people, Rep. Lewis believes that we are better served by a campaign, than a movement. Id like him to listen to Neil Youngs song, Old Man. Because in his younger days, he, too, heard some of his elders say that now is not the time for a movement.
By treating the Sanders movement as if it were simply another campaign, I believe that those in the Clinton campaign will do so much damage that it risks the fall election. As Ive noted, based upon general elections coming down to states, I am fully confident that Bernie Sanders will win against any republican. But I do not think that Hillary would be in the same position. She might well win, but it will be a tougher fight. And among the reasons for that is the old Democratic Party belief that progressives have nowhere else to go. That tends to be true in campaign contests, but not so for movements.
Peace,
H2O Man